A non-marginal role for tasks
Abstract
1King's College, London. Email: Peter.Skehan@kcl.ac.uk
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PPP and the skill-builders' view is that language acquisition is teacher-driven, whereas TBLT views language acquisition as learner-driven.
“As Skehan (2002, p. 294) noted, PPP and the skill-builders' view is that language acquisition is teacher-driven, whereas, with support from decades of SLA research, TBLT views language acquisition as learner-driven.”
From In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues (2016) · cites this paper as Skehan, 2002
PPP, delivered following a one-size-fits-all commercial textbook, undermines the teacher's creativity and decision-making role.
“As Skehan (2002) pointed out in a response to an earlier flurry of charges from Bruton (2002a), it is Bruton's favored language-based, lockstep PPP, delivered following the dictates of a one-size-fits-all commercial textbook, which really undermines the teacher's creativity and decision-making role.”
From In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues (2016) · cites this paper as Skehan, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
- Authors
- Skehan, P.
- Corresponding author
- Skehan, P.
- ORCID
- Skehan, P.
- Venue
- ELT Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 289-295
- ISSN
- 0951-0893 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4526
- OpenAlex
- W2116889015
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 31.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ELT Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- tasks, task-based language teaching, task design, language learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review