Cited by 118RNA Research and SplicingHIV Research and TreatmentRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The HIV-1 5’ LTR poly(A) site is inactivated by U1 snRNP interaction with the downstream major splice donor site

Open access
Ashe, Mark P., Pearson, Louise H., Proudfoot, Nick J.·1997·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

The inactivity of the 5' long terminal repeat (LTR) poly(A) site immediately downstream of the cap site maximizes the production of HIV-1 transcripts. In this paper, we demonstrate that this inactivity is mediated by the interaction of the U1 snRNP with the major splice donor site (MSD). The inhibition of the HIV-1 poly(A) site by U1 snRNP relies on a series of delicately balanced RNA processing signals. These include the poly(A) site, the major splice donor site and the splice acceptor sites. The inherent efficiency of the HIV-1 poly(A) site allows maximal activity where there is no donor site (in the 3' LTR) but full inhibition by the downstream MSD (in the 5' LTR). The MSD must interact efficiently with U1 snRNP to completely inhibit the 5' LTR poly(A) site, whereas the splice acceptor sites are inefficient, allowing full-length genomic RNA production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/emboj/16.18.5752

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both HIV-1 and foamy viruses, the primary factor in splice-site-mediated suppression is the binding of U1 snRNP to the major splice donor site.

    “Furthermore, in both HIV-1 and foamy viruses, the primary factor in splice-site-mediated suppression is the binding of U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U1 snRNP), part of the spliceosome complex, to the major splice donor site (Ashe et al. 1995, 1997, 2000, Schrom et al. 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashe, M. P., Pearson, L. H., & Proudfoot, N. J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
1997-09-15
Volume
16
Issue
18
Pages
5752-5763
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2156223412
Cited by
118
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
HIV-1, 5' long terminal repeat, poly(A) site, U1 snRNP, RNA splicing, polyadenylation, RNA processing, splice acceptor site, viral RNA synthesis, cap site
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Globins, HeLa Cells, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Poly A, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Recombinant Proteins, RNA Splicing, Transcription, Genetic, Transfection, HIV-1, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, HIV Long Terminal Repeat, Ribonucleoprotein, U1 Small Nuclear

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review