The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solution structure and basis for functional activity of stromal cell‐derived factor‐1; dissociation of CXCR4 activation from binding and inhibition of HIV‐1
Open accessAbstract
The three-dimensional structure of stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) was determined by NMR spectroscopy. SDF-1 is a monomer with a disordered N-terminal region (residues 1-8), and differs from other chemokines in the packing of the hydrophobic core and surface charge distribution. Results with analogs showed that the N-terminal eight residues formed an important receptor binding site; however, only Lys-1 and Pro-2 were directly involved in receptor activation. Modification to Lys-1 and/or Pro-2 resulted in loss of activity, but generated potent SDF-1 antagonists. Residues 12-17 of the loop region, which we term the RFFESH motif, unlike the N-terminal region, were well defined in the SDF-1 structure. The RFFESH formed a receptor binding site, which we propose to be an important initial docking site of SDF-1 with its receptor. The ability of the SDF-1 analogs to block HIV-1 entry via CXCR4, which is a HIV-1 coreceptor for the virus in addition to being the receptor for SDF-1, correlated with their affinity for CXCR4. Activation of the receptor is not required for HIV-1 inhibition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The protein product of CCL11 resulting from differential signal peptide cleavage is predicted to retain additional amino-acid residues at its N terminus, a key region specifying binding and activity of chemokines.44”
From Whole-genome sequencing suggests a chemokine gene cluster that modifies age at onset in familial Alzheimer's disease (2015) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures
Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., & Thornton, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889892009944 · Cited by 24,581
MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures
Kraulis, P. J. (1991) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889891004399 · Cited by 14,011
Jones, T. A., Zou, J.-Y., Cowan, S. W., & Kjeldgaard, M. (1991) · Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0108767390010224 · Cited by 12,616
NMR with Proteins and Nucleic Acids
Wüthrich, K. (1986) · Europhysics news · doi:10.1051/epn/19861701011 · Cited by 8,028
NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
(2006) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781847555236-00336 · Cited by 5,874
Nicholls, A. O., Sharp, K. A., & Honig, B. H. (1991) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340110407 · Cited by 5,230
HIV-1 Entry Cofactor: Functional cDNA Cloning of a Seven-Transmembrane, G Protein-Coupled Receptor
Feng, Y. Y., Broder, C. C., Kennedy, P. E., & Berger, E. A. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5263.872 · Cited by 4,169
X-PLOR Version 3.1: A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR
Brünger, A. T. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,424
Raster3D Version 2.0. A program for photorealistic molecular graphics
Merritt, E. A., & Murphy, M. E. P. (1994) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444994006396 · Cited by 2,493
Nagasawa, T., Hirota, S., Tachibana, K., Takakura, N., Nishikawa, S.-I., Kitamura, Y., Yoshida, N., Kikutani, H., & Kishimoto, T. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382635a0 · Cited by 2,382
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 738
Kontos, C., Bounkari, O. E., Krammer, C., Sinitski, D., Hille, K., Zan, C., Yan, G., Wang, S., Gao, Y., Brandhofer, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19764-z · Cited by 62
Fugetaxis: active movement of leukocytes away from a chemokinetic agent
Vianello, F., Olszak, I. T., & Poznansky, M. C. (2005) · Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00109-005-0675-z · Cited by 65
“Discrepancies were also found in the concentration of SDF-1 required for inhibition of HIV entry (40–80 nM)—again, higher than the concentrations that would expected to be required for receptor signaling and binding [36].”
BackgroundYang, O. O., Swanberg, S. L., Lu, Z., Dziejman, M., McCoy, J., Luster, A. D., Walker, B. D., & Herrmann, S. H. (1999) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.73.6.4582-4589.1999 · Cited by 64
“Using a Kd of 3 nM for (125)ISDF-1a (9), the calculated Ki for SDF-1b was 4 nM (34 ng/ml) and the Ki for Met-SDF-1b was 15 nM (129 ng/ml) (Fig.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Ins and Outs of Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Studies to Improve Transplantation Outcomes
Marquez‐Curtis, L. A., Turner, A. R., Sridharan, S., Ratajczak, M. Z., & Janowska‐Wieczorek, A. (2010) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1007/s12015-010-9212-8 · Cited by 61
“Previous studies have demonstrated the essential role of the N terminus, particularly the first nine residues, as the major site for direct interaction with the CXCR4 receptor and subsequent signal transduction [65].”
BackgroundMonomeric Solution Structure of the Prototypical ‘C' Chemokine Lymphotactin,
Elgin, E. S., McCaslin, D. R., Kitabwalla, M., Pauza, C. D., Markley, J. L., & Volkman, B. F. (2001) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi011106p · Cited by 65
Glimm, H., Tang, P., Clark‐Lewis, I., Kalle, C. V., & Eaves, C. J. (2002) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v99.9.3454 · Cited by 63
Self-citationAltenburg, J. D., Broxmeyer, H. E., Jin, Q., Cooper, S. H., Basu, S., & Alkhatib, G. (2007) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00268-07 · Cited by 62
“ture demonstrating that CXCL12 is at least a twofold-morepotent HIV inhibitor than is CXCL12 (14, 21).”
BackgroundAnderluh, M., Kocic, G. M., Tomović, K., Kocić, R., Deljanin-Ilić, M., & Šmelcerović, A. (2016) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.07.009 · Cited by 62
Ohtsuki, T., Hosono, O., Kobayashi, H., Munakata, Y., Souta, A., Shioda, T., & Morimoto, C. (1998) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00763-7 · Cited by 62
Retention of CXCR4 in the endoplasmic reticulum blocks dissemination of a T cell hybridoma
Zeelenberg, I. S., Stalle, L. R.-V., & Roos, E. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci11330 · Cited by 62
“This mutation changes the chemokine from an agonist into a nonsignaling antagonist (33).”
BackgroundSasaki, M., Hasegawa, H., Kohno, M., Inoue, A., Ito, M. R., & Fujita, S. (2003) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.588 · Cited by 62
Carter, P. H. (2002) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00351-4 · Cited by 62
Structural insights into CXCR4 modulation and oligomerization
Saotome, K., McGoldrick, L. L., Ho, J.-H., Ramlall, T. F., Shah, S., Moore, M. J., Kim, J. H., Leidich, R., Olson, W. C., & Franklin, M. C. (2024) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-024-01397-1 · Cited by 61
Chemokine CXCL1 Dimer Is a Potent Agonist for the CXCR2 Receptor
Ravindran, A., Sawant, K. V., Sarmiento, J., Navarro, J., & Rajarathnam, K. (2013) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m112.443762 · Cited by 61
Self-citationBioluminescent CXCL12 fusion protein for cellular studies of CXCR4 and CXCR7
Luker, K. E., Gupta, M., & Luker, G. D. (2009) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000113126 · Cited by 61
“This design strategy maintains the secretion signal for CXCL12 and an unfused N-terminus of the chemokine, which is critical for binding to CXCR4 (26).”
BackgroundChemokine binding proteins: An immunomodulatory strategy going viral
González-Motos, V., Kropp, K. A., & Viejo‐Borbolla, A. (2016) · Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2016.02.007 · Cited by 61
“Chemokines can interact with both GAGs and the chemokine receptor simultaneously through distinct domains, although for some chemokines these domains may overlap [8,9].”
Histopathological growth patterns as a candidate biomarker for immunomodulatory therapy
van Dam, P., Daelemans, S., Ross, E. L., Waumans, Y., Laere, S. V., Latacz, E., Steen, R. V., Pooter, C. D., Kockx, M. M., Dirix, L. Y., et al. (2018) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2018.01.009 · Cited by 62
Puchert, M., & Engele, J. (2013) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-013-1747-y · Cited by 60
“RDC1, now termed CXCR7, binds CXCL12 with an affinity that is about ten times higher than that of CXCR4 (Balabanian et al. 2005; Crump et al. 1997).”
Microfluidic Investigation of BDNF‐Enhanced Neural Stem Cell Chemotaxis in CXCL12 Gradients
Xu, H., & Heilshorn, S. C. (2012) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201202208 · Cited by 60
Choi, W., & An, J. (2011) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1258/ebm.2011.010389 · Cited by 59
Getschman, A. E., Imai, Y., Larsen, O., Peterson, F. C., Wu, X., ROSENKILDE, M. M., Hwang, S. T., & Volkman, B. F. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1704958114 · Cited by 59
“Inhibition of chemokine signaling by small molecule or peptide antagonists typically blocks GPCR signaling by binding the orthosteric site and preventing activation by the chemokine agonist (13, 14).”
BackgroundBanisadr, G., Dicou, E., Berbar, T., Rostène, W. H., Lombet, A., & Haour, F. (2000) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/s0165-5728(00)00338-6 · Cited by 59
Chemokine Receptor Oligomerization and Allostery
Stephens, B. S., & Handel, T. M. (2013) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394587-7.00009-9 · Cited by 58
Regulation of CNS precursor function by neuronal chemokines
Watson, A. E. S., Goodkey, K., Footz, T. K., & Voronova, A. (2019) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134533 · Cited by 57
Christopherson, K. W., Uralil, S. E., Porecha, N. K., Zabriskie, R. C., Kidd, S. M., & Ramin, S. M. (2006) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2006.03.012 · Cited by 58
Fedyk, E. R., Ryan, D. H., Ritterman, I., & Springer, T. A. (1999) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1002/jlb.66.4.667 · Cited by 58
“These KDs agree with those from the lone investigation reporting the binding of radiolabeled SDF-1 to a human T cell line [24] and are in general agreement with KDs for other chemokine receptors and their ligands.”
ResultEffect of the chemokine receptor CXCR7 on proliferation of carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo
Meijer, J. M., Ogink, J., & Roos, E. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604727 · Cited by 59
“Second, the K1R mutant of CXCL12, which is a CXCR4 antagonist (Crump et al, 1997), also induced proliferation.”
BackgroundMethodRetractedMolecular determinants for CC-chemokine recognition by a poxvirus CC-chemokine inhibitor
Seet, B. T., Singh, R., Paavola, C. D., Lau, E. K., Handel, T. M., & McFadden, G. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.171069398 · Cited by 57
How cytokines can influence the brain: A role for chemokines?
Guyon, A., Massa, F., Rovère, C., & Nahon, J. (2008) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.04.009 · Cited by 57
“SDF-1α interactions with its receptor CXCR4 occur at two binding sites, a ‘docking site’ in the N-terminus of CXCR4, and a ‘signaling site’, supposed to transduce the signal (Crump et al., 1997).”
Gozansky, E. K., Louis, J. M., Caffrey, M. S., & Clore, G. M. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.11.003 · Cited by 57
“A comparison of the current solution NMR structure of SDF-1a with individual subunits from two independently solved crystal structures(9,10) and with the original NMR structure of Crump et al.(4) is provided in Figures 2(a) and (b), respectively.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOpposite Effects of SDF-1 on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication
Maréchal, V., Arenzana‐Seisdedos, F., Heard, J., & Schwartz, O. (1999) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.73.5.3608-3615.1999 · Cited by 57
“Second, SDF-1 analogs, which act as CXCR4 antagonists, do not promote Ca(21) intracellular changes although they retain their anti-HIV activity (17, 27).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHo, T. K., Tsui, J. C. S., Xu, S., Leoni, P., Abraham, D., & Baker, D. (2010) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.044 · Cited by 58
Ruiz-Argüello, M. B., Smith, V. P., Campanella, G. S. V., Baleux, F., Arenzana‐Seisdedos, F., Luster, A. D., & Alcamı́, A. (2007) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02111-07 · Cited by 56
“The N-terminal four residues of CXCL12 (Lys-1, Pro-2, Val-3, and Ser-4) are essential for receptor binding and activation (16), whereas the Lys-24, His-25, and Lys-27 cluster of residues constitutes an essential component of the heparin binding site, which in turn is distinct from that required for binding to and sign…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe molecular pharmacology of AMD11070: An orally bioavailable CXCR4 HIV entry inhibitor
Mosi, R., Anastassova, V., Cox, J. H., Darkes, M. C., Idzan, S. R., Labrecque, J., Lau, G., Nelson, K. L., Patel, K., Santucci, Z., et al. (2011) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2011.11.020 · Cited by 55
Ravindran, A., Joseph, P. R. B., & Rajarathnam, K. (2009) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi901194p · Cited by 55
Self-citationElucidation of relaxin-3 binding interactions in the extracellular loops of RXFP3
Bathgate, R. A. D., Oh, M. H. Y., Ling, W. J. J., Kaas, Q., Hossain, M. A., Gooley, P. R., & Rosengren, K. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2013.00013 · Cited by 55
“…that involves an interaction between the globular part of the protein ligand and the extracellular loops of the receptor and second, an insertion of a flexible arm into the transmembrane helical bundle to induce a structural change leading to intracellular signaling (Crump et al., 1997).”
BackgroundZhang, L., DeRider, M. L., McCornack, M. A., Jao, S., Isern, N., Ness, T. L., Moyer, R. W., & LiWang, P. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0602142103 · Cited by 54
Kraemer, S., Lue, H., Zernecke, A., Kapurniotu, A., Andreetto, E., Frank, R., Lennartz, B., Weber, C., & Bernhagen, J. (2010) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.10-168559 · Cited by 55
Huma, Z. E., Sanchez, J., Lim, H. D., Bridgford, J. L., Huang, C., Parker, B. J., Pazhamalil, J. G., Porebski, B. T., Pfleger, K. D. G., Lane, J. R., et al. (2017) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aai8529 · Cited by 54
CXCR2: a target for pancreatic cancer treatment?
Hertzer, K. M., Donald, G. W., & Hines, O. J. (2013) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · doi:10.1517/14728222.2013.772137 · Cited by 53
“Although no studies are yet available showing the interaction of CXCR2 with its chemokine binding partners, information does exist regarding modeling studies of CCR2 and structural studies of CXCR4 as well as other chemokine receptors [68,69].”
BackgroundZiarek, J. J., Getschman, A. E., Butler, S. J., Taleski, D., Stephens, B. S., Kufareva, I., Handel, T. M., Payne, R. J., & Volkman, B. F. (2013) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/cb400274z · Cited by 53
“The original NMR structure of CXCL12WT in acetate buffer (PDB ID 1SDF; (10)) possesses a helix orientation (~55° relative to the β-sheet) incompatible with dimerization.”
BackgroundElucidating a Key Component of Cancer Metastasis: CXCL12 (SDF-1α) Binding to CXCR4
Tamamis, P., & Floudas, C. A. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci500069y · Cited by 53
CXCR2 Macromolecular Complex in Pancreatic Cancer: A Potential Therapeutic Target in Tumor Growth
Wang, S., Wu, Y., Hou, Y., Guan, X., Castelvetere, M. P., Oblak, J. J., Banerjee, S., Filtz, T. M., Sarkar, F. H., Chen, X., et al. (2013) · Translational Oncology · doi:10.1593/tlo.13133 · Cited by 55
Takekoshi, T., Ziarek, J. J., Volkman, B. F., & Hwang, S. T. (2012) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-0494 · Cited by 53
“The CXCL12 N-terminus is critical for receptor activation (32) and is cleaved into an inactive form by serum proteases (33).”
BackgroundCXCL12/CXCR4-Axis Dysfunctions: Markers of the Rare Immunodeficiency Disorder WHIM Syndrome
Bachelerie, F. (2010) · Disease Markers · doi:10.1155/2010/475104 · Cited by 53
Lee, Y., Kim, J. M., & Lee, E. J. (2008) · Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1677/joe-08-0250 · Cited by 53
“Furthermore, SDF1b is extensively expressed throughout the rat brain, especially in cerebral endothelial cells, while SDF1a is localized in specific neuronal structures such as cingulate (Stumm et al. 2002).”
MethodInfluentialCashman, J., Dykstra, B. J., Clark‐Lewis, I., Eaves, A. C., & Eaves, C. J. (2002) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20010916 · Cited by 53
Self-citationFadini, G. P., & Avogaro, A. (2013) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.007 · Cited by 52
Benredjem, B., Girard, M., Rhainds, D., St‐Onge, G., & Heveker, N. (2016) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m116.762252 · Cited by 52
“Both CXCL11 and CXCL12 interactions with their canonical receptors conform this model, with key roles for the chemokine N-loop in receptor recognition, and deletion of the chemokine N-terminus reportedly affecting signaling (11-13).”
BackgroundArafiles, J. V. V., Hirose, H., Akishiba, M., Tsuji, S., Imanishi, M., & Futaki, S. (2020) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00064 · Cited by 55
Molecular Determinants of Receptor Binding and Signaling by the CX3C Chemokine Fractalkine
Mizoue, L. S., Sullivan, S. K., King, D., Kledal, T. N., Schwartz, T. W., Bacon, K. B., & Handel, T. M. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m101348200 · Cited by 54
The Human CC Chemokine MIP-1β Dimer Is Not Competent to Bind to the CCR5 Receptor
Jin, H., Shen, X., Baggett, B., Kong, X., & LiWang, P. J. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m702654200 · Cited by 51
Lacy, M., Kontos, C., Brandhofer, M., Hille, K., Gröning, S., Sinitski, D., Bourilhon, P., Rosenberg, E., Krammer, C., Thavayogarajah, T., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23554-5 · Cited by 54
Identification and characterization of SKAT-2, a novel Th2-specific zinc finger gene
Blanchard, A. D., Page, K. R., Watkin, H., Hayward, P., Wong, T., Bartholomew, M. A., Quint, D. J., Daly, M. G., Garcia-Lopez, J., & CHAMPION, B. R. (2000) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/1521-4141(200011)30:11 · Cited by 9
Kazmierski, W. M., Kenakin, T., & Gudmundsson, K. S. (2005) · Chemical Biology & Drug Design · doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2005.00319.x · Cited by 51
“Crystallographic and NMR studies have shown that the SDF-1a monomer has a conventional chemokine topology, consisting Chem Biol Drug Des 2006; 67: 13–26 21 of three domains: the N-terminus characterized by mostly extended conformation, three antiparallel b-strands and a C-terminal a-helix that is packed against the b-…”
BackgroundInfluentialMercier, A. L., Bonnavion, R., Yu, W., Alnouri, M. W., Ramas, S., Zhang, Y., Jäger, Y., Roquid, K. A., Jeong, H., Sivaraj, K. K., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2021596118 · Cited by 49
Bhaloo, S. I., Wu, Y., Bras, A. L., Yu, B., Gu, W., Xie, Y., Deng, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., Kong, D., et al. (2018) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.312945 · Cited by 49
Structural determinants of CCR5 recognition and HIV-1 blockade in RANTES.
Nardese, V., Longhi, R., Polo, S., Sironi, F. M., Arcelloni, C., Paroni, R. C., DeSantis, C., Sarmientos, P., Rizzi, M., Bolognesi, M., et al. (2001) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/89653 · Cited by 50
NMR Solution Structure and Receptor Peptide Binding of the CC Chemokine Eotaxin-2,
Mayer, K. L., & Stone, M. J. (2000) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi000523j · Cited by 50
Chemokines as Molecular Targets for Therapeutic Intervention
Howard, O. M. Z., Oppenheim, J. J., & Wang, J. M. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1023/a:1020587407535 · Cited by 50
Herberg, S., Fulzele, S., Yang, N., Shi, X., Hess, M. C., Periyasamy‐Thandavan, S., Hamrick, M. W., Isales, C. M., & Hill, W. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0085 · Cited by 49
“After birth, SDF-1 signaling continues to be important in regulating physiological tissue homeostasis, hematopoiesis, and angiogenesis.9–11 Binding of SDF-1 to CXCR4 mediates the migration of CXCR4-expressing cells toward gradients of SDF-1 and this chemotactic property regulates the homing and retention of hematopoie…”
Luo, Y., Azad, A. K., Karanika, S., Basourakos, S. P., Zuo, X., Wang, J., Yang, L., Yang, G., Korentzelos, D. K., Yin, J., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.31237 · Cited by 49
“Further studies demonstrated that IL-8 treatment can upregulate CXCR7 and suggested that an IL-8-CXCR7 positive-feedback loop contributes to malignant progression.(19,20) Remarkably, CXCR7 was reported to interact with epidermal growth receptor (EGFR) and stimulate increased levels of phosphoEGFR (p-EGFR) and phospho-…”
BackgroundGustavsson, M. B., Dyer, D. P., Zhao, C., & Handel, T. M. (2019) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaw3657 · Cited by 49
Bouhamdan, M., Strayer, D. S., Wei, D., Mukhtār, M., Duan, L.-X., Hoxie, J. A., & Pomerantz, R. J. (2001) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301411 · Cited by 49
Structural Determinants of Ubiquitin-CXC Chemokine Receptor 4 Interaction
Saini, V., Marchese, A., Tang, W., & Majetschak, M. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111.298505 · Cited by 47
A novel CXCR4 antagonist derived from human SDF-1β enhances angiogenesis in ischaemic mice
Tan, Y., Li, Y., Xiao, J., Shao, H., Ding, C., Arteel, G. E., Webster, K. A., Yan, J., Yu, H., Cai, L., et al. (2009) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvp044 · Cited by 48
“N-terminal amino acid residues in SDF-1a are the major site for direct interaction with the receptor and subsequent signal transduction, whereas the second amino acid proline plays a key role in SDF-1a receptor activation.(23,24) Therefore, in the present study, we developed a novel peptide antagonist against CXCR4, S…”
A whole genome association study of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Malawi
Joubert, B. R., Lange, E. M., Franceschini, N., Mwapasa, V., North, K. E., & Meshnick, S. R. (2010) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/gm138 · Cited by 48
Jacobs, E. S., Keating, S. M., Abdel‐Mohsen, M., Gibb, S. L., Heitman, J. W., Inglis, H. C., Martin, J. N., Zhang, J., Kaidarova, Z., Deng, X., et al. (2017) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02051-16 · Cited by 48
“2A and B, in spite of the fact that the CXCR4 binding domain resides in the N terminus of the protein (57).”
BackgroundCAMRA: Chemical shift based computer aided protein NMR assignments
Gronwald, W., Willard, L., Jellard, T., Boyko, R. F., Rajarathnam, K., Wishart, D. S., Sönnichsen, F. D., & Sykes, B. D. (1998) · Journal of Biomolecular NMR · doi:10.1023/a:1008321629308 · Cited by 48
Self-citationJoseph, P. R. B., Sarmiento, J., Mishra, A. K., Das, S., Garofalo, R., Navarro, J., & Rajarathnam, K. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.146555 · Cited by 47
Self-citationFilippo, T. R. M., Galindo, L. T., Barnabé, G. F., Ariza, C. B., Mello, L. E., Juliano, M. A., Juliano, L., & Porcionatto, M. A. (2013) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2013.06.003 · Cited by 47
“Following binding, the activation domain composed of amino acid residues 1–8 (KPVSLSYR) binds to the N-terminal end of the receptor, inducing a conformational change that, in turn, allows binding of G-protein to the intracellular domains of the receptor, leading to activation of signaling pathways involved in the cont…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHeterologous quaternary structure of CXCL12 and its relationship to the CC chemokine family
Murphy, J. W., Yuan, H., Kong, Y., Xiong, Y., & Lolis, E. (2009) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.22666 · Cited by 47
Okamoto, R., Mandal, K., Ling, M. F., Luster, A. D., Kajihara, Y., & Kent, S. B. H. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201310574 · Cited by 48
Janssens, R., Mortier, A., Boff, D., Ruytinx, P., Gouwy, M., Vantilt, B., Larsen, O., Daugvilaite, V., ROSENKILDE, M. M., Parmentier, M., et al. (2017) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2017.03.009 · Cited by 47
Dual Targeting of the Chemokine Receptors CXCR4 and ACKR3 with Novel Engineered Chemokines
Hanes, M. S., Salanga, C. L., Chowdry, A. B., Comerford, I., McColl, S. R., Kufareva, I., & Handel, T. M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.675108 · Cited by 47
“Although removal of the first few residues dramatically reduces receptor affinity (by 100-fold) (23), we hoped that exploring a large sequence library would permit the identification of high affinity CXCL12 variants that are naturally resistant to proteolytic inactivation in vivo.”
BackgroundInfluentialCharacterization of Nef-CXCR4 Interactions Important for Apoptosis Induction
Huang, M., Jin, L., James, C. O., Khan, M. B., Powell, M. D., & Bond, V. C. (2004) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.78.20.11084-11096.2004 · Cited by 47
“These two sites appear to be unstructured in the solution structure of SDF-1 (27, 37).”
BackgroundResultHiesinger, W., Perez‐Aguilar, J. M., Atluri, P., Marotta, N. A., Frederick, J. R., Fitzpatrick, J. R., McCormick, R. C., Muenzer, J. R., Yang, E., Levit, R. D., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.110.009431 · Cited by 46
Neuropeptide Y regulates a vascular gateway for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
Singh, P., Hoggatt, J., Kamocka, M. M., Mohammad, K. S., Saunders, M. R., Li, H., Speth, J. M., Carlesso, N., Guise, T. A., & Pelus, L. M. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci94687 · Cited by 47
Hunger, C., Odemis, V., & Engele, J. (2012) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.06.020 · Cited by 43
Evasins: Tick Salivary Proteins that Inhibit Mammalian Chemokines
Bhusal, R. P., Eaton, J. R. O., Chowdhury, S. T., Power, C., Proudfoot, A. E. I., Stone, M. J., & Bhattacharya, S. (2019) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2019.10.003 · Cited by 45
“Alternatively, chemokines can be categorized based on their homeostatic versus inflammatory functions [46].”
BackgroundChemokine Oligomerization in Cell Signaling and Migration
Wang, X., Sharp, J. S., Handel, T. M., & Prestegard, J. H. (2013) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386931-9.00020-9 · Cited by 52
Nedjai, B., Li, H., Stroke, I. L., Wise, E. L., Webb, M. L., Merritt, J. R., Henderson, I. M., Klon, A. E., Cole, A. G., Horuk, R., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01660.x · Cited by 47
Hira, V. V. V., Verbovšek, U., Breznik, B., Srdič, M., Novinec, M., Kakar, H., Wormer, J. R., van der Swaan, B., Lenar≷cic̆, B., Juliano, L., et al. (2016) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.12.021 · Cited by 45
“It has been shown that cleavage of 2 residues from the N-terminus is sufficient to abolish activation of the receptor [42].”
BackgroundSzpakowska, M., Meyrath, M., Reynders, N., Counson, M., Hanson, J., Steyaert, J., & Chevigné, A. (2018) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2018.03.007 · Cited by 44
Ohnishi, Y., Senda, T., Nandhagopal, N., Sugimoto, K., Shioda, T., Nagai, Y., & Mitsui, Y. (2000) · Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research · doi:10.1089/10799900050116390 · Cited by 45
A CXC Chemokine SDF-1/PBSF: A Ligand for a HIV Coreceptor, CXCR4
Nagasawa, T., Tachibana, K., & Kawabata, K. (1998) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60403-4 · Cited by 45
Thiele, S., Mungalpara, J., Steen, A., ROSENKILDE, M. M., & Våbenø, J. (2014) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.12842 · Cited by 44
“The role of Tyr116 for the function of CXCR4 antagonists According to the two-step model of chemokine receptor activation, the interaction between CXCR4 and CXCL12 involves distinct receptor and chemokine domains in binding and activation (Crump et al., 1997; Gupta et al., 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialXu, L., Li, Y., Sun, H., Li, D., & Hou, T. (2013) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c3mb70120d · Cited by 48
Stephens, B. S., Ngo, T., Kufareva, I., & Handel, T. M. (2020) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aay5024 · Cited by 44
Thermodynamic characterization of interleukin‐8 monomer binding to CXCR1 receptor N‐terminal domain
Fernando, H., Nagle, G. T., & Rajarathnam, K. (2006) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05579.x · Cited by 43
Self-citationZhou, H., & Tai, H. (2000) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1006/abbi.1999.1555 · Cited by 43
Solution Structure of CCL21 and Identification of a Putative CCR7 Binding Site
Love, M., Sandberg, J. L., Ziarek, J. J., Gerarden, K. P., Rode, R. R., Jensen, D. R., McCaslin, D. R., Peterson, F. C., & Veldkamp, C. T. (2012) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi201601k · Cited by 47
Masaie, H., Oritani, K., Yokota, T., Takahashi, I., Shirogane, T., Ujiie, H., Ichii, M., Saitoh, N., Maeda, T., Tanigawa, R., et al. (2007) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2007.03.010 · Cited by 43
Xue, X., Lu, Q., Wei, H., Wang, D., Chen, D., He, G., Huang, L., Wang, H., & Wang, X. (2011) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002162 · Cited by 42
“For example, the residues 12–17 in the N-loop of CXCL12 were shown to be important for receptor binding [47,48].”
BackgroundViejo‐Borbolla, A., Munoz, A., Tabarés, E., & Alcamı́, A. (2009) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/vir.0.011940-0 · Cited by 42
“The chemokine domains involved in the interaction with GAGs or chemokine receptor have been characterized for hCXCL12a (Crump et al., 1997).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChemokine‐derived peptides as carriers for gene delivery to CXCR4 expressing cells
Egorova, A., Kiselev, A., Häkli, M., Ruponen, M., Баранов, В. С., & Urtti, A. O. (2009) · The Journal of Gene Medicine · doi:10.1002/jgm.1366 · Cited by 42
“The motif was additionally included in the second peptide [6].”
BackgroundBraun, M., Wunderlin, M., Spieth, K., Knöchel, W., Gierschik, P., & Moepps, B. (2002) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.168.5.2340 · Cited by 42
“1 shows an alignment of the amino acid sequences of xSDF-1 and SDF-1 of man (hSDF-1 ), mouse (mSDF-1 ), and cat (cSDF-1 ) as well as KC, the mouse equivalent of human growth-related oncogene (GRO)- , GRO- , and/or GRO- (19, 35).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLim, J. K., Lu, W., Hartley, O., & DeVico, A. L. (2006) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0406290 · Cited by 42
“These domains typically form disordered structures and as such are prone to proteolytic digestion [69–72].”
BackgroundEbert, L. M., & McColl, S. R. (2001) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.166.8.4870 · Cited by 42
“Synthetic SDF-1 and I-TAC (30) (a gift from Dr.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Crump, M. P., Gong, J., Loetscher, P., Rajarathnam, K., Amara, A., Arenzana‐Seisdedos, F., Virelizier, J., Baggiolini, M., Sykes, B. D., & Clark‐Lewis, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Bern (CH)
- Institut Pasteur (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Sykes, Brian D.
- Clark‐Lewis, Ian
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 6996-7007
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- PMC
- PMC1170303
- OpenAlex
- W1964083898
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council Canada
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
- Keywords
- CXCL12, chemokine structure, N-terminal disordered region, receptor binding sites, CXCR4, HIV-1 coreceptor, HIV-1 entry inhibition, receptor activation, chemokine antagonists
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Binding Sites, Models, Biological, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Structure-Activity Relationship, Virus Replication, HIV-1, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Chemokines, Anti-HIV Agents, Receptors, CXCR4, Chemokines, CXC, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular, Chemokine CXCL12
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review