Cited by 478RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and SplicingRNA modifications and cancer

Recognition of AUG and alternative initiator codons is augmented by G in position +4 but is not generally affected by the nucleotides in positions +5 and +6

Open access
Kozak, Marilyn·1997·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

A primer extension (toeprinting) assay was used to monitor selection by ribosomes of the first versus the second AUG codon as a function of introducing mutations on the 3' side (positions +4, +5 and +6) of the first AUG codon. Six different flanking codons starting with G (GCG, GCU, GCC, GCA, GAU and GGA) strongly augmented selection of AUG#1 when compared with matched mRNAs that had A or C instead of G in position +4. Augmentation by G in position +4 failed only when it was combined with U in position +5, as in the sequence augGUA. In contrast with the usual enhancing effect of introducing G in position +4, most mutations in position +5 had no discernible effect, as shown with the series augANA (where N = C, A, G or U) and the series augCNA. AUG codon recognition was also unaffected by mutations in position +6, as shown by testing four mRNAs that had augCCN as the start site. Thus the primary sequence context that augments the recognition of AUG start codons does not appear generally to extend beyond G in position +4. When the toeprinting assay was used with mRNAs that initiate translation at CUG instead of AUG, cugGAU was not recognized better than cugGGU, contradicting the hypothesis that initiation at non-AUG codons might be favored by A instead of G in position +5.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2482

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of +4G and downstream nucleotides on translation initiation has been inconclusive.

    “First, while the -3R (site 4 in the first column of Table 5) has been demonstrated repeatedly to enhance translation initiation, the effect of +4G (site 10 in Table 5), as well as nucleotides downstream, on translation initiation has been inconclusive [46,49,50,51].”

    From Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines (2021) · cites this paper as [51]

    The paper does not leave the effect of +4G inconclusive: the Discussion says its positive effect is generalizable, while the results report no significant effect from changes at +5 or +6 in the tests described. It notes a sequence-specific exception to the usual +4G effect, but presents that as an exception rather than an inconclusive overall finding (Discussion; Figures 4–6, page not provided in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is little evidence that +4G and downstream nucleotides contribute to translation initiation.

    “There is little evidence that +4G and downstream nucleotides contribute to translation initiation.”

    From Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines (2021) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Discussion reports little or no effect from varying nucleotides at +5 and +6, supporting that part of the claim. But it also reports a strong, generalizable contribution of G at +4 to initiator-codon recognition, contrary to the claim about +4G. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The -3R has been demonstrated repeatedly to enhance translation initiation.

    “First, while the -3R (site 4 in the first column of Table 5) has been demonstrated repeatedly to enhance translation initiation, the effect of +4G (site 10 in Table 5), as well as nucleotides downstream, on translation initiation has been inconclusive [46,49,50,51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kozak,M. (1995) Adherence to the first-AUG rule when a second AUG codon follows closely upon the first. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 92,
  2. Lin,F.-T., MacDougald,O.A., Diehl,A.M. and Lane,M.D. (1993) A 30-kDa alternative translation product of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α message: transcriptional activator lacking antimitotic activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 9606-9610.
  3. Ossipow,V., Descombes,P. and Schibler,U. (1993) CCAAT/enhancer binding protein mRNA is translated into multiple proteins with different transcription activation potentials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 8219-8223.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kozak, M.
Affiliations
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Kozak, Marilyn
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
1997-05-01
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
2482-2492
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2126177402
Cited by
478
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 33915, R01GM033915)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
codon context, non-AUG start codons, translation initiation
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Guanine, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Plasmids, RNA Caps, RNA, Messenger, Structure-Activity Relationship, Protein Biosynthesis, Open Reading Frames, Codon, Initiator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review