The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage‐ responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins
Bork, P., Hofmann, K., Bucher, P., Neuwald, A. F., Altschul, S. F., & Koonin, E. V. (1997) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.11.1.9034168 · Cited by 746
Paulovich, A. G., & Hartwell, L. H. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90481-6 · Cited by 588
Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM -Like Kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in Yeast Cell Cycle Checkpoint Pathways
Sanchez, Y., Desany, B. A., Jones, W. J., Liu, Q., Wang, B., & Elledge, S. J. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5247.357 · Cited by 585 · cited 7×
“As previously reported, after HU treatment alone some Rad53 phosphorylation occurred in wild-type cells and in the rad17Δ, rad24Δ, mec3Δ and ddc1Δ mutants (Figure 6B; Sanchez et al., 1996; Sun et al., 1996).”
BackgroundInfluentialMorrow, D. M., Tagle, D. A., Shiloh, Y., Collins, F. S., & Hieter, P. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90480-8 · Cited by 370
Sun, Z., Fay, D. S., Marini, F., Foiani, M., & Stern, D. F. (1996) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.10.4.395 · Cited by 300
de la Torre‐Ruiz, M., Green, C. M., & Lowndes, N. F. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.9.2687 · Cited by 147 · cited 13×
“Epistasis and overexpression analysis indicate that RAD9 is in a distinct epistasis group from RAD24, RAD17, MEC3 and DDC1, and that these two groups can be placed in separate but additive branches that converge on MEC1 and RAD53 (de la Torre-Ruiz et al., 1998).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian DNA Repair and the DNA Damage Checkpoints
Sancar, A., Lindsey-Boltz, L. A., Ünsal-Kaçmaz, K., & Linn, S. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723 · Cited by 3,317
The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective
Zhou, B.-B. S., & Elledge, S. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35044005 · Cited by 3,213
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint
Stewart, G. S., Wang, B., Bignell, C. R., Taylor, A. M. R., & Elledge, S. J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01446 · Cited by 874
Cellular Responses to DNA Damage
Norbury, C. J., & Hickson, I. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.367 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Vialard, J. E.
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 5679-5688
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- OpenAlex
- W2006765383
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/emboj/17.19.5679
- The paper
- Vialard, J. E. (1998). The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. The EMBO Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.19.5679
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
