Cited by 384Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCellular transport and secretion

Direct imaging of lateral movements of AMPA receptors inside synapses

Open access
Tardin, Catherine, Cognet, Laurent, Bats, Cécile, Lounis, Brahim, Choquet, Daniel·2003·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Trafficking of AMPA receptors in and out of synapses is crucial for synaptic plasticity. Previous studies have focused on the role of endo/exocytosis processes or that of lateral diffusion of extra-synaptic receptors. We have now directly imaged AMPAR movements inside and outside synapses of live neurons using single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Inside individual synapses, we found immobile and mobile receptors, which display restricted diffusion. Extra-synaptic receptors display free diffusion. Receptors could also exchange between these membrane compartments through lateral diffusion. Glutamate application increased both receptor mobility inside synapses and the fraction of mobile receptors present in a juxtasynaptic region. Block of inhibitory transmission to favor excitatory synaptic activity induced a transient increase in the fraction of mobile receptors and a decrease in the proportion of juxtasynaptic receptors. Altogether, our data show that rapid exchange of receptors between a synaptic and extra-synaptic localization occurs through regulation of receptor diffusion inside synapses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/emboj/cdg463

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glutamate stimulation enhances exchange between synaptic and extrasynaptic receptor pools and increases overall motility of glutamate receptors.

    “Glutamate stimulation enhances the exchange between these pools and increases overall motility of glutamate receptors (Tardin et al., 2003).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Tardin et al., 2003

    The Regulation of AMPARs mobility inside synapses section reports that bath-applied glutamate increased diffusion within synapses and reduced the proportion of immobile synaptic receptors. The Discussion links these changes to movement from synapses into extrasynaptic membrane, supporting enhanced exchange. But the same results section says extrasynaptic receptor diffusion was not significantly changed, so the claim of increased overall motility is broader than the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A pool of synaptic receptors is immobile while another synaptic pool and extrasynaptic receptors are rapidly moving.

    “A pool of synaptic receptors was shown to be immobile while another synaptic pool and extrasynaptic receptors were rapidly moving.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 384

Authors
Tardin, C., Cognet, L., Bats, C., Lounis, B., & Choquet, D.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Choquet, Daniel
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2003-09-15
Volume
22
Issue
18
Pages
4656-4665
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2084807003
Cited by
384
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 29
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Oskar-Bordeaux (Universite de Bordeaux) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
AMPA receptors, receptor trafficking, synaptic plasticity, lateral diffusion, receptor mobility, glutamate, synaptic inhibition, single-molecule fluorescence microscopy, live neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Bicuculline, Cells, Cultured, Diffusion, Embryo, Mammalian, Hippocampus, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Monosaccharide Transport Proteins, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Synapses, Tetrodotoxin, Glutamic Acid, Glucose Transporter Type 2, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review