Cited by 60Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict ZonesDiverse Research Studies OverviewLand Rights and Reforms

The Agricultural Impacts of Armed Conflicts: The Case of Fulani Militia

George, Justin, Adelaja, Adesoji, Awokuse, Titus O·2021·European Review of Agricultural Economics

Abstract

Fulani ethnic militia (FEM) violence has increased significantly in recent years, making it one of the most lethal groups in the world. However, empirical evidence on the impacts of FEM on agriculture is scarce. We investigate the agricultural impacts of such violence in the case of Nigeria using a nationally representative panel dataset and armed conflict data. We find that increased FEM violence reduces agricultural output, outputs of specific staple crops and area harvested. FEM violence also reduces farmers’ cattle holdings by increasing cattle thefts and losses and reducing purchased cattle. The agricultural development implications of the FEM cannot be ignored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/erae/jbaa022

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cattle theft by criminal syndicates and the illegal extraction and competition over natural resources such as gold by non-state actors creates an enabling environment for armed banditry.

    “Cattle theft by the criminal syndicates and the illegal extraction and competition over natural resources such as gold by non-state actors creates an enabling environment for armed banditry.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, J., Adelaja, A., & Awokuse, T. O.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Adelaja, Adesoji
Venue
European Review of Agricultural Economics
Published
2020-09-13
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
538-572
ISSN
  • 0165-1587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3618
OpenAlex
W3084755387
Cited by
60
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Review of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Research Studies Overview
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
Keywords
armed conflict, agricultural production, staple crops, harvested area, cattle theft, Nigeria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review