Cited by 559Political Conflict and GovernanceTransboundary Water Resource ManagementNatural Resources and Economic Development

Climate change, rainfall, and social conflict in Africa

Hendrix, Cullen S, Salehyan, Idean·2012·Journal of Peace Research

Abstract

Much of the debate over the security implications of climate change revolves around whether changing weather patterns will lead to future conflict. This article addresses whether deviations from normal rainfall patterns affect the propensity for individuals and groups to engage in disruptive activities such as demonstrations, riots, strikes, communal conflict, and anti-government violence. In contrast to much of the environmental security literature, it uses a much broader definition of conflict that includes, but is not limited to, organized rebellion. Using a new database of over 6,000 instances of social conflict over 20 years – the Social Conflict in Africa Database (SCAD) – it examines the effect of deviations from normal rainfall patterns on various types of conflict. The results indicate that rainfall variability has a significant effect on both large-scale and smaller-scale instances of political conflict. Rainfall correlates with civil war and insurgency, although wetter years are more likely to suffer from violent events. Extreme deviations in rainfall – particularly dry and wet years – are associated positively with all types of political conflict, though the relationship is strongest with respect to violent events, which are more responsive to abundant than scarce rainfall. By looking at a broader spectrum of social conflict, rather than limiting the analysis to civil war, we demonstrate a robust relationship between environmental shocks and unrest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022343311426165

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weak regimes or social systems will be financially strained through the loss of tax revenues and foreign exchange earnings during the recession caused by weather shocks.

    “weak regimes or social systems will be financially strained through the loss of tax revenues and foreign exchange earnings during the recession caused by weather shocks”

    From The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways (2024) · cites this paper as Hendrix and Salehyan 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendrix, C. S., & Salehyan, I.
Affiliations
  • William & Mary (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
Venue
Journal of Peace Research
Published
2012-01-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
35-50
ISSN
  • 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3578
OpenAlex
W2115231242
Cited by
559
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 16
FWCI
118.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Army Research Office
  • Army Research Laboratory
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Transboundary Water Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
Keywords
climate change, rainfall variability, social conflict, environmental security, civil war, insurgency, political violence, riots, strikes, community conflict, environmental shocks, Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review