Cited by 27Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryDietary Effects on HealthAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fasting vs. no fasting prior to catheterization laboratory procedures: the SCOFF trial

Open access

Abstract

Background and Aims: Current guidelines recommend 6 h of solid food and 2 h of clear liquid fasting for patients undergoing cardiac procedures with conscious sedation. There are no data to support this practice, and previous single-centre studies support the safety of removing fasting requirements. The objective of this study was to determine the non-inferiority of a no-fasting strategy to fasting prior to cardiac catheterization procedures which require conscious sedation. Methods: This is a multicentre, investigator-initiated, non-inferiority, randomized trial conducted in Australia with a prospective open-label, blinded endpoint design. Patients referred for coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related procedures were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to fasting as normal (6 h solid food and 2 h clear liquid) or no-fasting requirements (encouraged to have regular meals but not mandated to do so). Recruitment occurred from 2022 to 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of aspiration pneumonia, hypotension, hyperglycaemia, and hypoglycaemia assessed with a Bayesian approach. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction score, new ventilation requirement (non-invasive and invasive), new intensive care unit admission, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, 30-day pneumonia. Results: A total of 716 patients were randomized with 358 in each group. Those in the fasting arm had significantly longer solid food fasting (13.2 vs. 3.0 h, Bayes factor >100, indicating extreme evidence of difference) and clear liquid fasting times (7.0 vs. 2.4 h, Bayes factor >100). The primary composite outcome occurred in 19.1% of patients in the fasting arm and 12.0% of patients in the no-fasting arm. The estimate of the mean posterior difference in proportions with credibility interval (CI) in the primary composite outcome was −5.2% (95% CI −9.6 to −.9), favouring no fasting. This result confirms the non-inferiority (posterior probability >99.5%) and superiority (posterior probability 99.1%) of no fasting for the primary composite outcome. The no-fasting arm had improved patient satisfaction scores with a posterior mean difference of 4.02 points (95% CI 3.36–4.67, Bayes factor >100). Secondary outcome events were observed to be similar. Conclusions: In patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and CIED-related procedures, no fasting was non-inferior and superior to fasting for the primary composite outcome of aspiration pneumonia, hypotension, hyperglycaemia, and hypoglycaemia. Patient satisfaction scores were significantly better with no fasting. This supports removing fasting requirements for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization laboratory procedures that require conscious sedation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae573

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Cook, 2007, Percutaneous coronary interventions in Europe: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections based on data up to 2004, Clin Res Cardiol, 96, 375, 10.1007/s00392-007-0513-0 · DOI
  2. Wood, 2002, Cardiac pacemakers from the patient’s perspective, Circulation, 105, 2136, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000016183.07898.90 · DOI
  3. Apfelbaum, 2017, Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration, Anesthesiology, 126, 376, 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Murdock, 1990, Comparison of meglumine sodium diatrizoate, iopamidol, and iohexol for coronary angiography and ventriculography, Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 19, 179, 10.1002/ccd.1810190306 · DOI
  5. Proctor, 2023, Fasting prior to coronary procedures, a thing of the past: a retrospective audit, Heart Lung Circ, 32, S434, 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.06.645 · DOI
  6. Bacus, 2020, Fasting prior to cardiac catheterisation: a single-centre observational study, N Z Med J, 133, 16
  7. El-Sharkawy, 2021, Fasting and surgery timing (FaST) audit, Clin Nutr, 40, 1405, 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.033 · DOI
  8. de Klerk, 2023, Incidence of excessive preoperative fasting: a prospective observational study, Br J Anaesth, 130, e440, 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.017 · DOI
  9. Chon, 2017, Perioperative fasting and the patient experience, Cureus, 9, e1272, 10.7759/cureus.1272 · DOI
  10. Bangalore, 2021, Evidence-based practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, Circulation, 144, e107, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000996 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Tamborrino, 2024, Do we need fasting prior to coronary angiography? The CORO-NF randomized pragmatic study, Am J Med, 137, 666, 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.01.024 · DOI
  12. Boukantar, 2024, A randomized controlled trial of nonfasting vs fasting before interventional coronary procedures, JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 17, 1200, 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.03.033 · DOI
  13. Bode, 2022, A randomized trial of non-fasting vs. fasting for cardiac implantable electronic device procedures (Fast-CIED study), Europace, 24, 1617, 10.1093/europace/euac081 · DOI
  14. Kimpton, 2023, Not fasting before cardiac catheterisation: an observational cohort study of patient experience and adverse events, Heart Lung Circ, 32, S85, 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.04.234 · DOI
  15. Ferreira, 2023, Safety and Care OF no Fasting prior to catheterisation laboratory procedures: a non-inferiority randomised control trial protocol (SCOFF trial), Eur Heart J Open, 3, oead111, 10.1093/ehjopen/oead111 · DOI
  16. Brar, 2014, Haemodynamic-guided fluid administration for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: the POSEIDON randomised controlled trial, Lancet Rheumatol, 383, 1814, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60689-9 · DOI
  17. Son, 2017, Pneumonitis and pneumonia after aspiration, J Dent Anesth Pain Med, 17, 1, 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.1.1 · DOI
  18. McAlister, 2005, The relation between hyperglycemia and outcomes in 2,471 patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia, Diabetes Care, 28, 810, 10.2337/diacare.28.4.810 · DOI
  19. Workgroup on Hypoglycemia, American Diabetes Association, 2005, Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia, Diabetes Care, 28, 1245, 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1245 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Popovic, 2021, Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing patient distress from preoperative fasting in cataract surgery, Ophthalmic Epidemiol, 28, 337, 10.1080/09286586.2020.1849742 · DOI
  21. Woods, 2024, Fasting versus a heart-healthy diet before cardiac catheterization: a randomized controlled trial, Am J Crit Care, 33, 29, 10.4037/ajcc2024115 · DOI
  22. Atkinson, 2023, Randomized controlled trial of liberal vs. standard fasting instructions in percutaneous cardiac procedures, Perioper Med, 12, 44, 10.1186/s13741-023-00333-z · DOI
  23. Sheehan, 2004, Fasting hyperglycemia: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment, Diabetes Technol Ther, 6, 525, 10.1089/1520915041705910 · DOI
  24. Rybicka, 2011, The dawn phenomenon and the Somogyi effect—two phenomena of morning hyperglycaemia, Endokrynol Pol, 62, 276

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ferreira, D., Hardy, J., Meere, W., Butel-Simoes, L., Sritharan, S., Ray, M., French, M., McGee, M., O’Connor, S., Whitehead, N., Turner, S., Healey, P., Davies, A., Morris, G., Jackson, N., Barlow, M., Ford, T., Leask, S., Oldmeadow, C., Attia, J., Sverdlov, A., Collins, N., Boyle, A., & Wilsmore, B.
Affiliations
  • John Hunter Hospital (AU)
  • Gosford Hospital (AU)
  • Tamworth Hospital (AU)
  • Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU)
  • Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Ferreira, David
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-09-01
Volume
45
Issue
47
Pages
4990-4998
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W4402103529
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 3
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Hunter Hospital Charitable Trust
  • Hunter Medical Research Institute
  • Medical Research Support Program
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia (106025)
  • NSW Health Cardiovascular Capacity Building
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
conscious sedation, cardiac catheterization, aspiration pneumonia, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, hypotension, patient satisfaction, non-inferiority, coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiac implantable electronic devices, Bayesian analysis, intensive care unit admission, 30-day mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Fasting, Female, Cardiac Catheterization, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypotension, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Aspiration, Prospective Studies, Conscious Sedation, Procedural Sedation, Coronary Angiography, Patient Satisfaction, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review