CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 92Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsVascular Procedures and ComplicationsClinical practice guidelines implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence-Based Practices in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Open access
Bangalore, Sripal, Barsness, Gregory W., Dangas, George D., Kern, Morton J., Rao, Sunil V., Shore-Lesserson, Linda, Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E., on behalf of the American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health·2021·Circulation
DOI 10.1161/cir.0000000000000996
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Cardiac catheterization procedures have rapidly evolved and expanded in scope and techniques over the past few decades. However, although some practices have emerged based on evidence, many traditions have persisted based on beliefs and theoretical concerns. The aim of this review is to highlight common preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure catheterization laboratory practices where evidence has accumulated over the past few decades to support or discount traditionally held practices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/cir.0000000000000996

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence supporting prolonged preprocedural fasting for cardiac catheterization or implantation of electronic devices is weak, with no difference in gastric pH or volume between fasting 2 to 4 hours versus >4 hours.

    “Evidence supporting prolonged preprocedural fasting for cardiac catheterization or implantation of electronic devices is weak, with no difference in gastric pH or volume between fasting 2 to 4 hours versus >4 hours.180,181”

    From Malnutrition and Cachexia in Inpatients With Acute Cardiac Conditions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2026) · cites this paper as [181]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/ccd.29744 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Mishra, A. Strict versus no fasting prior to cardiac catheterization: a prospective evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes. Can we safely have our patients eat with cardiac catheterization - nix or allow: the CHOW NOW study [abstract 11758]. SCAI 2020 Virtual Scientific Sessions: Virtual Conference, May 14 to 16, 2020. Accessed January 19, 2021. https://virtual2020.scai.org
  5. 10.1007/s00330-020-07255-0 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10557-015-6618-1 · DOI
  7. 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7836 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/14651858.CD002967.pub4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278 · DOI
  10. 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3630 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.01.428 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.056 · DOI
  13. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.04.017 · DOI
  14. Wolak, T, Aliev, E, Rogachev, B, Baumfeld, Y, Cafri, C, Abu-Shakra, M, Novack, V. Renal safety and angiotensin II blockade medications in patients undergoing non-emergent coronary angiography: a randomized controlled study. Isr Med Assoc J. 2013;15:682–687.
  15. 10.1007/s11255-008-9368-1 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.04.019 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.079 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.089 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.016 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu298 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy136 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.024 · DOI
  23. 10.4330/wjc.v6.i3.107 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.10.014 · DOI
  25. 10.1148/radiol.2015151143 · DOI
  26. 10.1056/NEJM198710013171401 · DOI
  27. 10.2214/ajr.162.3.8109489 · DOI
  28. 10.1148/radiol.2017170107 · DOI
  29. 10.2214/AJR.14.13810 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/1089253215625111 · DOI
  31. Bergeron, P, Enns, J, Delima, L, Dupuis, JY, Wynands, JE. Effects of routine premedication for cardiac catheterization on sedation, level of anxiety and arterial oxygen saturation. Can J Cardiol. 1995;11:201–205.
  32. 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.03.034 · DOI
  33. Baris, S, Karakaya, D, Aykent, R, Kirdar, K, Sagkan, O, Tür, A. Comparison of midazolam with or without fentanyl for conscious sedation and hemodynamics in coronary angiography. Can J Cardiol. 2001;17:277–281.
  34. 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se04660 · DOI
  35. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031678 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/bja/aen251 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/14651858.CD005563.pub3 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00101-5 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00009-1 · DOI
  41. 10.4065/mcp.2009.0724 · DOI
  42. 10.1186/s13063-019-3512-3 · DOI
  43. 10.1056/NEJMsa1610524 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.08.018 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.043 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq102 · DOI
  47. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185404 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01018-x · DOI
  49. 10.3390/jcm9030677 · DOI
  50. 10.1159/000362536 · DOI
  51. 10.1097/01634989-200306000-00002 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03262-1 · DOI
  53. 10.1253/circj.72.893 · DOI
  54. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187256 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.hjc.2017.12.001 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/ehjci/jew025 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s10554-013-0231-9 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00993-8 · DOI
  59. 10.1007/s00330-009-1498-z · DOI
  60. 10.1002/ccd.25209 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bangalore, S., Barsness, G. W., Dangas, G. D., Kern, M. J., Rao, S. V., Shore-Lesserson, L., Tamis-Holland, J. E., & on behalf of the American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Arteriosclerosis, T. A. V. B. C. O. C. A. S. N. C. O. C. S. A. A. A. C. O. L. A. C. H.
ORCID
Venue
Circulation
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2021-08-03
Volume
144
Issue
5
Pages
e107-e119
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
DOI
10.1161/cir.0000000000000996
OpenAlex
W3177238961
Cited by
92
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
catheterization laboratory, evidence-based practice, interventional cardiology, procedural quality
MeSH terms
Laboratories, Clinical, American Heart Association, Cardiac Catheterization, Humans, United States, Evidence-Based Medicine, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Health Care Surveys, Perioperative Care, Clinical Laboratory Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review