Cited by 4Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Great debate: fire-and-forget beats personalized lipid-lowering treatment

Tokgozoglu, Lale, Barkas, Fotios, Ray, Kausik K, Gianos, Eugenia·2025·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Key points in favour of or against fire-and-forget approach vs personalized therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf567

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tokgozoglu, L., Barkas, F., Ray, K. K., & Gianos, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Cardiology, Hacettepe University , Cinnah Caddesi 24/11 Cankaya Ankara ,
  • University of Ioannina (GR)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Hofstra University (US)
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2025-10-03
Volume
46
Issue
44
Pages
4751-4761
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W4414793081
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
statins, hypercholesterolemia, cardiovascular risk management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review