The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomarker-based risk assessment model in acute pulmonary embolism
Abstract
AIMS: Despite growing interest in biomarkers application for risk evaluation in acute pulmonary embolism (APE), no decision-making levels have been defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a biomarker-based risk stratification in 100 consecutive, normotensive on admission, APE patients (35 males, 65 females, 62+/-18 years). On admission serum NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) levels were assessed and echocardiography was performed. All-cause 40-day mortality was 15% and APE mortality was 8%. In univariable analysis, cTnT>0.07 microg/L predicted all-cause mortality, hazard ratio (HR) 9.2 (95% CI: 3.3-26.1, P<0.0001), and APE mortality, HR 18.1 (95% CI: 3.6-90.2, P=0.0004); similarly, NT-proBNP>7600 ng/L predicted all-cause and APE mortalities [HR 6.7 (95% CI: 2.4-19.0, P=0.0003) and 7.3 (95% CI: 1.7-30.6, P=0.007)]. NT-proBNP<600 ng/L indicated uncomplicated outcome. Multivariable analysis revealed that cTnT>0.07 microg/L was the most significant independent predictor, whereas NT-proBNP and systemic systolic blood pressure measured on admission and echocardiographic parameters were non-significant. APE mortality in patients with NT-proBNP> or =600 ng/L and cTnT> or =0.07 microg/L reached 33%. NT-proBNP<600 ng/L indicated group without deaths. APE mortality for patients with NT-proBNP> or =600 ng/L and cTnT<0.07 microg/L was 3.7%. Incorporation of echocardiographic data did not improve group selection. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous measurement of serum cTnT and NT-proBNP allows for precise APE prognosis. Normotensive patients on admission with cTnT> or =0.07 microg/L and NT-proBNP> or =600 ng/L are at high risk of APE mortality, whereas NTproBNP<600 ng/L indicates excellent prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease
Büller, H. R., Agnelli, G., Hull, R. D., Hyers, T. M., Prins, M. H., & Raskob, G. E. (2004) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.401s · Cited by 1,249
Cited by
2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism
Authors/Task Force Members, Konstantinides, S. V., Torbicki, A., Agnelli, G., Danchin, N., Fitzmaurice, D., Galiè, N., Gibbs, J. S. R., Huisman, M. V., Humbert, M., et al. (2014) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283 · Cited by 3,128
Self-citationCoutance, G., Cauderlier, E., Ehtisham, J., Hamon, M., & Hamon, M. (2011) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc10119 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Kostrubiec, M., Pruszczyk, P., Bochowicz, A., Pacho, R., Szulc, M., Kaczynska, A., Styczynski, G., Kuch-Wocial, A., Abramczyk, P., Bartoszewicz, Z., Berent, H., & Kuczynska, K.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-23
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2166-2172
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2117209851
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomarker-based risk assessment model in acute pulmonary embolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi336
- The paper
- Kostrubiec, M., Pruszczyk, P., Bochowicz, A., Pacho, R., Szulc, M., Kaczynska, A., Styczynski, G., Kuch-Wocial, A., Abramczyk, P., Bartoszewicz, Z., Berent, H., & Kuczynska, K. (2005). Biomarker-based risk assessment model in acute pulmonary embolism. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi336
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.