Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances detected by array-CGH are a frequent cause of congenital heart defects in selected patients

Thienpont, B., Mertens, L., de Ravel, T., Eyskens, B., Boshoff, D., Maas, N., Fryns, J.-P., Gewillig, M., Vermeesch, J. R., Devriendt, K.·2007·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are frequently caused by chromosomal imbalances, especially when associated with additional malformations, dysmorphism, or developmental delay. Only in a subset of such patients, a chromosomal aberration can be identified with current cytogenetic tests. Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array-CGH) now enables the detection of submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances at high resolution. In this report, we evaluate for the first time the use of array-CGH as a diagnostic tool in a selected group of patients with a CHD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients with a CHD of unknown cause but with features suggestive of a chromosomal aberration were selected. Array-CGH was performed using an in-house made 1 Mb micro-array. Chromosomal imbalances not previously described as polymorphisms were detected in 18/60 patients (30%). Ten of these (17%) are considered to be causal. In three deletions, genes known to cause CHDs were implicated (NKX2.5, NOTCH1, NSD1, EHMT). One patient carried a duplication of chromosome 22q11.2, previously associated with CHD. In the other six patients, both the de novo occurrence as well as the size of the imbalance indicated causality. In addition, seven inherited aberrations unreported thus far were detected. Their causal relationship with CHDs remains to be established. Finally, a mosaic monosomy 7 was not considered as causal but did enable to make a diagnosis of Fanconi anaemia. CONCLUSION: This study shows that array-CGH is able to provide an etiological diagnosis in a large proportion of patients with a CHD, selected for a 'chromosomal phenotype'. Besides their usefulness in genetic counselling, identified chromosomal aberrations may aid in the medical follow-up of these individuals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl560

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Thienpont, B., Mertens, L., de Ravel, T., Eyskens, B., Boshoff, D., Maas, N., Fryns, J.-P., Gewillig, M., Vermeesch, J. R., & Devriendt, K.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2007-10-17
Volume
28
Issue
22
Pages
2778-2784
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2144459152
Cited by
199
References
3
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances detected by array-CGH are a frequent cause of congenital heart defects in selected patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl560
The paper
Thienpont, B., Mertens, L., de Ravel, T., Eyskens, B., Boshoff, D., Maas, N., Fryns, J.-P., Gewillig, M., Vermeesch, J. R., & Devriendt, K. (2007). Submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances detected by array-CGH are a frequent cause of congenital heart defects in selected patients. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl560

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.