Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 596

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry

Zahn, R., Gerckens, U., Grube, E., Linke, A., Sievert, H., Eggebrecht, H., Hambrecht, R., Sack, S., Hauptmann, K. E., Richardt, G., Figulla, H.-R., Senges, J., on behalf of the German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions--Registry Investigators·2011·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Treatment of elderly symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and co-morbidities is challenging. Transcatheter aortic valve interventions [balloon valvuloplasty and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)] are evolving as alternative treatment options to surgical valve replacement. We report the first results of the prospective multi-centre German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions-Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2009 and December 2009, a total of 697 patients (81.4 ± 6.3 years, 44.2% males, and logistic EuroScore 20.5 ± 13.2%) underwent TAVI. Pre-operative aortic valve area was 0.6 ± 0.2 cm² with a mean transvalvular gradient of 48.7 ± 17.2 mmHg. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed percutaneously in the majority of patients [666 (95.6%)]. Only 31 (4.4%) procedures were done surgically: 26 (3.7%) transapically and 5 (0.7%) transaortically. The Medtronic CoreValve™ prosthesis was used in 84.4%, whereas the Sapien Edwards™ prosthesis was used in the remaining cases. Technical success was achieved in 98.4% with a post-operative mean transaortic pressure gradient of 5.4 ± 6.2 mmHg. Any residual aortic regurgitation was observed in 72.4% of patients, with a significant aortic insufficiency (≥Grade III) in only 16 patients (2.3%). Complications included pericardial tamponade in 1.8% and stroke in 2.8% of patients. Permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI became necessary in 39.3% of patients. In-hospital death rate was 8.2%, and the 30-day death rate 12.4%. CONCLUSION: In this real-world registry of high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, TAVI had a high success rate and was associated with moderate in-hospital complications. However, careful patient selection and continued hospital selection seem crucial to maintain these results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq339

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 596

Metadata

Authors
Zahn, R., Gerckens, U., Grube, E., Linke, A., Sievert, H., Eggebrecht, H., Hambrecht, R., Sack, S., Hauptmann, K. E., Richardt, G., Figulla, H.-R., Senges, J., & on behalf of the German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions--Registry Investigators
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2010-09-23
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
198-204
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2153417776
Cited by
596
References
2
FWCI
68.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq339
The paper
Zahn, R., Gerckens, U., Grube, E., Linke, A., Sievert, H., Eggebrecht, H., Hambrecht, R., Sack, S., Hauptmann, K. E., Richardt, G., Figulla, H.-R., Senges, J., & on behalf of the German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions--Registry Investigators. (2011). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq339

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.