Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis and risk stratification in a single test

Open access
Becattini, C., Agnelli, G., Vedovati, M. C., Pruszczyk, P., Casazza, F., Grifoni, S., Salvi, A., Bianchi, M., Douma, R., Konstantinides, S., Lankeit, M., Duranti, M.·2011·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: In patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), right ventricular dysfunction at echocardiography is associated with increased in-hospital mortality. The aims of this study in patients with acute PE were to identify a sensitive and simple criterion for right ventricular dysfunction at multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) using echocardiography as the reference standard and to evaluate the predictive value of the identified MDCT criterion for in-hospital death or clinical deterioration. METHODS AND RESULTS: Right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT was defined as the right-to-left ventricular dimensional ratio and was centrally assessed by a panel unaware of clinical and echocardiographic data. A right-to-left ventricular dimensional ratio ≥0.9 at MDCT had a 92% sensitivity for right ventricular dysfunction [95% confidence interval (CI) 88-96]. Overall, 457 patients were included in the outcome study: 303 had right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT. In-hospital death or clinical deterioration occurred in 44 patients with and in 8 patients without right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT (14.5 vs. 5.2%; P< 0.004). The negative predictive value of right ventricular dysfunction for death due to PE was 100% (95% CI 98-100). Right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT was an independent predictor for in-hospital death or clinical deterioration in the overall population [hazard ratio (HR) 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.7; P= 0.002] and in haemodynamically stable patients (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3-10.9; P= 0.007). CONCLUSION: In patients with acute PE, MDCT might be used as a single procedure for diagnosis and risk stratification. Patients without right ventricular dysfunction at MDCT have a low risk of in-hospital adverse outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr108

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Becattini, C., Agnelli, G., Vedovati, M. C., Pruszczyk, P., Casazza, F., Grifoni, S., Salvi, A., Bianchi, M., Douma, R., Konstantinides, S., Lankeit, M., & Duranti, M.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2011-04-18
Volume
32
Issue
13
Pages
1657-1663
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2125994450
Cited by
252
References
1
FWCI
17.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis and risk stratification in a single test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr108
The paper
Becattini, C., Agnelli, G., Vedovati, M. C., Pruszczyk, P., Casazza, F., Grifoni, S., Salvi, A., Bianchi, M., Douma, R., Konstantinides, S., Lankeit, M., & Duranti, M. (2011). Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis and risk stratification in a single test. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.