Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 550

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Lønborg, Jacob, Vejlstrup, Niels, Kelbæk, Henning, Bøtker, Hans Erik, Kim, Won Yong, Mathiasen, Anders B., Jørgensen, Erik, Helqvist, Steffen, Saunamäki, Kari, Clemmensen, Peter, Holmvang, Lene, Thuesen, Leif, Krusell, Lars Romer, Jensen, Jan S., Køber, Lars, Treiman, Marek, Holst, Jens Juul, Engstrøm, Thomas·2012·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Exenatide, a glucagon-like-peptide-1 analogue, increases myocardial salvage in experimental settings with coronary occlusion and subsequent reperfusion. We evaluated the cardioprotective effect of exenatide at the time of reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 172 patients with STEMI and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow 0/1 were randomly assigned to exenatide or placebo (saline) intravenously. Study treatment was commenced 15 min before intervention and maintained for 6 h after the procedure. The primary endpoint was salvage index calculated from myocardial area at risk (AAR), measured in the acute phase, and final infarct size measured 90 ± 21 days after pPCI by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). In 105 patients evaluated with CMR, a significantly larger salvage index was found in the exenatide group than in the placebo group (0.71 ± 0.13 vs. 0.62 ± 0.16; P= 0.003). Infarct size in relation to AAR was also smaller in the exenatide group (0.30 ± 0.15 vs. 0.39 ± 0.15; P= 0.003). In a regression analysis, there was a significant correlation between the infarct size and the AAR for both treatment groups and an analysis of covariance showed that datapoints in the exenatide group lay significantly lower than for the placebo group (P= 0.011). There was a trend towards smaller absolute infarct size in the exenatide group (13 ± 9 vs. 17 ± 14 g; P= 0.11). No difference was observed in left ventricular function or 30-day clinical events. No adverse effects of exenatide were observed. CONCLUSION: In patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI, administration of exenatide at the time of reperfusion increases myocardial salvage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr309

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 550

Metadata

Authors
Lønborg, J., Vejlstrup, N., Kelbæk, H., Bøtker, H. E., Kim, W. Y., Mathiasen, A. B., Jørgensen, E., Helqvist, S., Saunamäki, K., Clemmensen, P., Holmvang, L., Thuesen, L., Krusell, L. R., Jensen, J. S., Køber, L., Treiman, M., Holst, J. J., & Engstrøm, T.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2011-09-14
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
1491-1499
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2051298109
Cited by
550
References
2
FWCI
31.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr309
The paper
Lønborg, J., Vejlstrup, N., Kelbæk, H., Bøtker, H. E., Kim, W. Y., Mathiasen, A. B., Jørgensen, E., Helqvist, S., Saunamäki, K., Clemmensen, P., Holmvang, L., Thuesen, L., Krusell, L. R., Jensen, J. S., Køber, L., Treiman, M., Holst, J. J., & Engstrøm, T. (2012). Exenatide reduces reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr309

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.