The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bioresorbable scaffolds: rationale, current status, challenges, and future
Open accessAbstract
Current generation of drug-eluting stents has significantly improved the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention by substantially reducing in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. However, a potential limitation of these stents is the permanent presence of a metallic foreign body within the artery, which may cause vascular inflammation, restenosis, thrombosis, and neoatherosclerosis. The permanent stents also indefinitely impair the physiological vasomotor function of the vessel and future potential of grafting the stented segment. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) have the potential to overcome these limitations as they provide temporary scaffolding and then disappear, liberating the treated vessel from its cage and restoring pulsatility, cyclical strain, physiological shear stress, and mechanotransduction. While a number of BRSs are under development, two devices with substantial clinical data have already received a Conformité Européenne marking. This review article presents the current status of these devices and evaluates the challenges that need to be overcome before BRSs can become the workhorse device in coronary intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toughening of photo-curable polymer networks: a review
Ligon-Auer, S. C., Schwentenwein, M., Gorsche, C., Stampfl, J., & Liska, R. (2016) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c5py01631b · Cited by 447
Cassese, S., Byrne, R. A., Ndrepepa, G., Kufner, S., Wiebe, J., Repp, J., Schunkert, H., Fusaro, M., Kimura, T., & Kastrati, A. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00979-4 · Cited by 369
Haude, M., Ince, H., Abizaid, A., Toelg, R., Lemos, P. A., von Birgelen, C., Christiansen, E. H., Wijns, W., Neumann, F.-J., Kaiser, C., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00447-x · Cited by 349
Self-citationBio-resorbable polymer stents: a review of material progress and prospects
McMahon, S., Bertollo, N., Cearbhaill, E. D. O., Salber, J., Pierucci, L., Duffy, P., Dürig, T., Bi, V., & Wang, W. (2018) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.05.002 · Cited by 194
Bioresorbable Stents: Is This Where We Are Headed?
Wayangankar, S. A., & Ellis, S. G. (2015) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2015.08.011 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Iqbal, J., Onuma, Y., Ormiston, J., Abizaid, A., Waksman, R., & Serruys, P.
- Venue
- European Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-12-23
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 765-776
- ISSN
- 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
- 1522-9645
- OpenAlex
- W2165754633
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioresorbable scaffolds: rationale, current status, challenges, and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/eht542
- The paper
- Iqbal, J., Onuma, Y., Ormiston, J., Abizaid, A., Waksman, R., & Serruys, P. (2014). Bioresorbable scaffolds: rationale, current status, challenges, and future. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht542
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.