Cited by 59Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Applying novel methods to assess clinical outcomes: insights from the TRILOGY ACS trial

Bakal, J. A., Roe, M. T., Ohman, E. M., Goodman, S. G., Fox, K. A. A., Zheng, Y., Westerhout, C. M., Hochman, J. S. +3 more·2015·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Several methods provide new insights into understanding clinical trial composite endpoints, using both conventional and novel methods. The TRILOGY ACS trial is used as a contemporary example to prospectively compare these methods side by side. METHODS AND RESULTS: The traditional time-to-first-event, Andersen-Gill recurrent events method, win ratio, and a weighted composite endpoint (WCE) are compared using the randomized, active-control TRILOGY ACS trial. This trial had a neutral result and randomized 9326 patients managed without coronary revascularization within 10 days of their acute coronary syndrome to receive either prasugrel or clopidogrel and followed them for up to 30 months. The traditional composite, win ratio, and WCE demonstrated no significant survival advantage for prasugrel, whereas the Andersen-Gill method demonstrated a statistical advantage for prasugrel [hazard ratio (HR), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-0.97)]. The traditional composite used 73% of total patient events; 40% of these were derived from the death events. The win ratio used 66% of total events; deaths comprised 57% of these. Both Andersen-Gill and WCE methods used all events in all participants; however, with the Andersen-Gill method, death comprised 41% of the proportion of events, whereas with the WCE method, death comprised 64% of events. CONCLUSION: This study addresses the relative efficiency of various methods for assessing clinical trial events comprising the composite endpoint. The methods accounting for all events, in particular those incorporating their clinical relevance, appear most advantageous, and may be useful in interpreting future trials. This clinical and statistical advantage is especially evident with long-term follow-up where multiple non-fatal events are more common. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00699998.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu262

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with elevated triglycerides, atherosclerosis, or diabetes receiving statins are at substantial risk for recurrent, potentially fatal ischemic events.

    “In addition to their initial events, such patients are at substantial risk for recurrent, potentially fatal events.”

    From Effects of Icosapent Ethyl on Total Ischemic Events (2019) · cites this paper as [6]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakal, J. A., Roe, M. T., Ohman, E. M., Goodman, S. G., Fox, K. A. A., Zheng, Y., Westerhout, C. M., Hochman, J. S., Lokhnygina, Y., Brown, E. B., & Armstrong, P. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Duke University (US)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • British Heart Foundation (GB)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, P. W.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2014-07-10
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
385-392
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W1985541943
Cited by
59
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • University of Toronto
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
acute coronary syndrome, prasugrel, clopidogrel, composite endpoints, win ratio, recurrent event analysis, time to first event, event weighting, clinical trial outcome assessment, antiplatelet therapy
MeSH terms
Prasugrel Hydrochloride, Clopidogrel, Aged, Angina, Unstable, Humans, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Recurrence, Ticlopidine, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Stroke, Endpoint Determination, Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review