Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Marfan Sartan: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Milleron, Olivier, Arnoult, Florence, Ropers, Jacques, Aegerter, Philippe, Detaint, Delphine, Delorme, Gabriel, Attias, David, Tubach, Florence, Dupuis-Girod, Sophie, Plauchu, Henry, Barthelet, Martine, Sassolas, Francois, Pangaud, Nicolas, Naudion, Sophie, Thomas-Chabaneix, Julie, Dulac, Yves, Edouard, Thomas, Wolf, Jean-Eric, Faivre, Laurence, Odent, Sylvie, Basquin, Adeline, Habib, Gilbert, Collignon, Patrick, Boileau, Catherine, Jondeau, Guillaume·2015·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the benefit of adding Losartan to baseline therapy in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A double-blind, randomized, multi-centre, placebo-controlled, add on trial comparing Losartan (50 mg when <50 kg, 100 mg otherwise) vs. placebo in patients with MFS according to Ghent criteria, age >10 years old, and receiving standard therapy. 303 patients, mean age 29.9 years old, were randomized. The two groups were similar at baseline, 86% receiving β-blocker therapy. The median follow-up was 3.5 years. The evolution of aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva was not modified by the adjunction of Losartan, with a mean increase in aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva of 0.44 mm/year (s.e. = 0.07) (-0.043 z/year, s.e. = 0.04) in patients receiving Losartan and 0.51 mm/year (s.e. = 0.06) (-0.01 z/year, s.e. = 0.03) in those receiving placebo (P = 0.36 for the comparison on slopes in millimeter per year and P = 0.69 for the comparison on slopes on z-scores). Patients receiving Losartan had a slight but significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the study (5 mmHg). During the study period, aortic surgery was performed in 28 patients (15 Losartan, 13 placebo), death occurred in 3 patients [0 Losartan, 3 placebo, sudden death (1) suicide (1) oesophagus cancer (1)]. CONCLUSION: Losartan was able to decrease blood pressure in patients with MFS but not to limit aortic dilatation during a 3-year period in patients >10 years old. β-Blocker therapy alone should therefore remain the standard first line therapy in these patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv151

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Milleron, O., Arnoult, F., Ropers, J., Aegerter, P., Detaint, D., Delorme, G., Attias, D., Tubach, F., Dupuis-Girod, S., Plauchu, H., Barthelet, M., Sassolas, F., Pangaud, N., Naudion, S., Thomas-Chabaneix, J., Dulac, Y., Edouard, T., Wolf, J.-E., Faivre, L., Odent, S., Basquin, A., Habib, G., Collignon, P., Boileau, C., & Jondeau, G.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2015-05-02
Volume
36
Issue
32
Pages
2160-2166
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2113779039
Cited by
217
References
4
FWCI
18.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marfan Sartan: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv151
The paper
Milleron, O., Arnoult, F., Ropers, J., Aegerter, P., Detaint, D., Delorme, G., Attias, D., Tubach, F., Dupuis-Girod, S., Plauchu, H., Barthelet, M., Sassolas, F., Pangaud, N., Naudion, S., Thomas-Chabaneix, J., Dulac, Y., Edouard, T., Wolf, J.-E., Faivre, L., . . . Jondeau, G. (2015). Marfan Sartan: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv151

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.