Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 491

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neoatherosclerosis: overview of histopathologic findings and implications for intravascular imaging assessment

Open access
Otsuka, Fumiyuki, Byrne, Robert A., Yahagi, Kazuyuki, Mori, Hiroyoshi, Ladich, Elena, Fowler, David R., Kutys, Robert, Xhepa, Erion, Kastrati, Adnan, Virmani, Renu, Joner, Michael·2015·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Despite the reduction in late thrombotic events with newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), late stent failure remains a concern following stent placement. In-stent neoatherosclerosis has emerged as an important contributing factor to late vascular complications including very late stent thrombosis and late in-stent restenosis. Histologically, neoatherosclerosis is characterized by accumulation of lipid-laden foamy macrophages within the neointima with or without necrotic core formation and/or calcification. The development of neoatherosclerosis may occur in months to years following stent placement, whereas atherosclerosis in native coronary arteries develops over decades. Pathologic and clinical imaging studies have demonstrated that neoatherosclerosis occurs more frequently and at an earlier time point in DES when compared with bare metal stents, and increases with time in both types of implant. Early development of neoatherosclerosis has been identified not only in first-generation DES but also in second-generation DES. The mechanisms underlying the rapid development of neoatherosclerosis remain unknown; however, either absence or abnormal endothelial functional integrity following stent implantation may contribute to this process. In-stent plaque rupture likely accounts for most thrombotic events associated with neoatherosclerosis, while it may also be a substrate of in-stent restenosis as thrombosis may occur either symptomatically or asymptomatically. Intravascular optical coherence tomography is capable of detecting neoatherosclerosis; however, the shortcomings of this modality must be recognized. Future studies should assess the impact of iterations in stent technology and risk factor modification on disease progression. Similarly, refinements in imaging techniques are also warranted that will permit more reliable detection of neoatherosclerosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv205

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 491

Metadata

Authors
Otsuka, F., Byrne, R. A., Yahagi, K., Mori, H., Ladich, E., Fowler, D. R., Kutys, R., Xhepa, E., Kastrati, A., Virmani, R., & Joner, M.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2015-05-20
Volume
36
Issue
32
Pages
2147-2159
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2107233004
Cited by
491
References
0
FWCI
51.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neoatherosclerosis: overview of histopathologic findings and implications for intravascular imaging assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv205
The paper
Otsuka, F., Byrne, R. A., Yahagi, K., Mori, H., Ladich, E., Fowler, D. R., Kutys, R., Xhepa, E., Kastrati, A., Virmani, R., & Joner, M. (2015). Neoatherosclerosis: overview of histopathologic findings and implications for intravascular imaging assessment. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv205

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.