Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms of stent thrombosis analysed by optical coherence tomography: insights from the national PESTO French registry

Souteyrand, Geraud, Amabile, Nicolas, Mangin, Lionel, Chabin, Xavier, Meneveau, Nicolas, Cayla, Guillaume, Vanzetto, Gerald, Barnay, Pierre, Trouillet, Charlotte, Rioufol, Gilles, Rangé, Gregoire, Teiger, Emmanuel, Delaunay, Regis, Dubreuil, Olivier, Lhermusier, Thibault, Mulliez, Aurélien, Levesque, Sebastien, Belle, Loic, Caussin, Christophe, Motreff, Pascal·2016·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Angiography has limited value for identifying the causes of stent thrombosis (ST). We studied a large cohort of patients by optical coherence tomography (OCT) to explore ST characteristics and mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective multicentre registry was screened for patients with confirmed ST. Optical coherence tomography was performed after initial intervention to the culprit lesion (in 69% of cases in a deferred procedure). Stent thrombosis was classified as acute (AST), sub-acute (SAST), late (LST), and very late (VLST). Optical coherence tomography records were analysed in a central core lab. The analysis included 120 subjects aged 61.7 [51.4-70.7]; 89% male. Very late ST was the clinical presentation in 75%, LST in 6%, SAST in 15%, and AST in 4% of patients. Bare metal stents (BMS) were used in 39%, drug-eluting stents (DES) in 59% and bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in 2% of the cases. Optical coherence tomography identified an underlying morphological abnormality in 97% of cases, including struts malapposition (34%), neoatherosclerotic lesions (22%), major stent underexpansion (11%), coronary evagination (8%), isolated uncovered struts (8%), edge-related disease progression (8%), and neointimal hyperplasia (4%). Ruptured neoatherosclerotic lesions were more frequent with BMS than with DES (36 vs. 14%, P = 0.005), whereas coronary evaginations were more frequent with DES than with BMS (12 vs. 2%, P = 0.04). LST + VLST were mainly related to malapposition (31%) and neoatherosclerosis (28%), while prominent mechanisms for AST + SAST were malapposition (48%) and underexpansion (26%). CONCLUSION: In patients with confirmed ST, OCT imaging identified an underlying morphological abnormality in 97% of cases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv711

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Souteyrand, G., Amabile, N., Mangin, L., Chabin, X., Meneveau, N., Cayla, G., Vanzetto, G., Barnay, P., Trouillet, C., Rioufol, G., Rangé, G., Teiger, E., Delaunay, R., Dubreuil, O., Lhermusier, T., Mulliez, A., Levesque, S., Belle, L., Caussin, C., & Motreff, P.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2016-01-12
Volume
37
Issue
15
Pages
1208-1216
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2233380747
Cited by
299
References
16
FWCI
46.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of stent thrombosis analysed by optical coherence tomography: insights from the national PESTO French registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv711
The paper
Souteyrand, G., Amabile, N., Mangin, L., Chabin, X., Meneveau, N., Cayla, G., Vanzetto, G., Barnay, P., Trouillet, C., Rioufol, G., Rangé, G., Teiger, E., Delaunay, R., Dubreuil, O., Lhermusier, T., Mulliez, A., Levesque, S., Belle, L., Caussin, C., & Motreff, P. (2016). Mechanisms of stent thrombosis analysed by optical coherence tomography: insights from the national PESTO French registry. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv711

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.