Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,600

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part I): Clinical Characteristics, Diagnostic Criteria, and Pathophysiology

Open access
Ghadri, Jelena-Rima, Wittstein, Ilan Shor, Prasad, Abhiram, Sharkey, Scott, Dote, Keigo, Akashi, Yoshihiro John, Cammann, Victoria Lucia, Crea, Filippo, Galiuto, Leonarda, Desmet, Walter, Yoshida, Tetsuro, Manfredini, Roberto, Eitel, Ingo, Kosuge, Masami, Nef, Holger M, Deshmukh, Abhishek, Lerman, Amir, Bossone, Eduardo, Citro, Rodolfo, Ueyama, Takashi, Corrado, Domenico, Kurisu, Satoshi, Ruschitzka, Frank, Winchester, David, Lyon, Alexander R, Omerovic, Elmir, Bax, Jeroen J, Meimoun, Patrick, Tarantini, Guiseppe, Rihal, Charanjit, Y.-Hassan, Shams, Migliore, Federico, Horowitz, John D, Shimokawa, Hiroaki, Lüscher, Thomas Felix, Templin, Christian·2018·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a poorly recognized heart disease that was initially regarded as a benign condition. Recently, it has been shown that TTS may be associated with severe clinical complications including death and that its prevalence is probably underestimated. Since current guidelines on TTS are lacking, it appears timely and important to provide an expert consensus statement on TTS. The clinical expert consensus document part I summarizes the current state of knowledge on clinical presentation and characteristics of TTS and agrees on controversies surrounding TTS such as nomenclature, different TTS types, role of coronary artery disease, and etiology. This consensus also proposes new diagnostic criteria based on current knowledge to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy076

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 1,600

Metadata

Authors
Ghadri, J.-R., Wittstein, I. S., Prasad, A., Sharkey, S., Dote, K., Akashi, Y. J., Cammann, V. L., Crea, F., Galiuto, L., Desmet, W., Yoshida, T., Manfredini, R., Eitel, I., Kosuge, M., Nef, H. M., Deshmukh, A., Lerman, A., Bossone, E., Citro, R., Ueyama, T., Corrado, D., Kurisu, S., Ruschitzka, F., Winchester, D., Lyon, A. R., Omerovic, E., Bax, J. J., Meimoun, P., Tarantini, G., Rihal, C., Y.-Hassan, S., Migliore, F., Horowitz, J. D., Shimokawa, H., Lüscher, T. F., & Templin, C.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2018-05-29
Volume
39
Issue
22
Pages
2032-2046
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2805683701
Cited by
1,600
References
4
FWCI
104.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part I): Clinical Characteristics, Diagnostic Criteria, and Pathophysiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy076
The paper
Ghadri, J.-R., Wittstein, I. S., Prasad, A., Sharkey, S., Dote, K., Akashi, Y. J., Cammann, V. L., Crea, F., Galiuto, L., Desmet, W., Yoshida, T., Manfredini, R., Eitel, I., Kosuge, M., Nef, H. M., Deshmukh, A., Lerman, A., Bossone, E., Citro, R., . . . Templin, C. (2018). International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part I): Clinical Characteristics, Diagnostic Criteria, and Pathophysiology. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy076

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.