Cited by 20Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCardiac Health and Mental HealthMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Sustaining telehealth among cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation services: a qualitative framework study

Open access
Thomas, Emma E, Chambers, Rebecca, Phillips, Samara, Rawstorn, Jonathan C, Cartledge, Susie·2023·European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Abstract

Aims: As we move into a new phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, cardiac and pulmonary services are considering how to sustain telehealth modalities long-term. It is important to learn from services that had greater telehealth adoption and determine factors that support sustained use. We aimed to describe how telehealth has been used to deliver cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation services across Queensland, Australia. Methods and results: Semi-structured interviews (n = 8) and focus groups (n = 7) were conducted with 27 cardiac and pulmonary clinicians and managers from health services across Queensland between June and August 2021. Interview questions were guided by Greenhalgh’s Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability framework. Hybrid inductive/deductive framework analysis elicited six main themes: (i) Variable levels of readiness; (ii) Greater telehealth uptake in pulmonary vs. cardiac rehabilitation; (iii) Safety and risk management; (iv) Client willingness—targeted support required; (v) Equity and access; and (vi) New models of care. We found that sustained integration of telehealth in cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation will require contributions from all stakeholders: consumers (e.g. co-design), clinicians (e.g. shared learning), health services (e.g. increasing platform functionality), and the profession (e.g. sharing resources). Conclusion: There are opportunities for telehealth programmes servicing large geographic areas and opportunities to increase programme participation rates more broadly. Centralized models of care serving large geographic areas could maximize sustainability with current resource limitations; however, realizing the full potential of telehealth will require additional funding for supporting infrastructure and workforce. Individuals and organizations both have roles to play in sustaining telehealth in cardiac and pulmonary services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurjcn/zvac111

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Alison JA, McKeough ZJ, Johnston K, McNamara RJ, Spencer LM, Jenkins SC, McDonald VM, Frith P, Cafarella P, Brooke M. Australian and New Zealand pulmonary rehabilita- tion guidelines. Respirology 2017;22:800-819.
  2. Ades PA, Keteyian SJ, Wright JS, Hamm LF, Lui K, Newlin K, Shepard DS, Thomas RJ.; Increasing cardiac rehabilitation participation from 20% to 70%: a road map from the million hearts cardiac rehabilitation collaborative. Elsevier USA 2017;92:234-242.
  3. Banner D, Kandola D, Bates J, Horvat D, Ignaszewski A, Singer J, Lear SA. Patient experi- ences of undertaking a virtual cardiac rehabilitation program. Canad J Cardiovasc Nursing 2019;29:6-14.
  4. Jackson AC, Higgins RO, Murphy BM, Rogerson M, Le Grande MR. Cardiac rehabilita- tion in Australia: a brief survey of program characteristics. Heart Lung Circ 2018;27: 1415-1420.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, E. E., Chambers, R., Phillips, S., Rawstorn, J. C., & Cartledge, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Metro North Hospital and Health Service (AU)
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Emma E
Venue
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Published
2022-12-05
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
795-803
ISSN
  • 1474-5151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1953
OpenAlex
W4310710753
Cited by
20
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Heart Foundation of Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
telemedicine, cardiac rehabilitation, pulmonary rehabilitation, COVID-19 pandemic, health care delivery, models of care, risk management, co-design, Queensland
MeSH terms
Australia, Humans, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Qualitative Research, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review