Cited by 1Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

18-01: Is Conduction Block during Sinus Rhythm Associated with Development of Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation?

Open access
Lanters, Eva, Yaksh, Ameeta, Kik, Charles, Knops, Paul, Teuwen, Christophe, Van Der Does, Lisette, Bogers, Ad, Allessie, Maurits, De Groot, Natasja·2016·EP Europace

Abstract

Purpose: Conduction block (CB) is associated with initiation and persistence of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unknown if and in what extent CB is present in electrically non-remodeled atria during sinus rhythm (SR). Aims of the study are to quantify the amount and spatial distribution of CB measured at a high-resolution scale at the entire epicardial surface of the atria and to test the correlation between CB and development of early post-operative AF (PoAF). Methods: High-resolution (128/192 electrodes; inter-electrode distances 2.0mm) intra-operative epicardial mapping of the right atrium (RA), Bachmann's Bundle, pulmonary vein area and left atrium during SR was performed in 209 patients (175 male, age 66 ± 9.6years) with coronary artery disease. The area underneath the mapping array was divided into 1cm2 quadrants. Differences in activation times between neighboring electrodes were calculated in areas of 2x2 electrodes. The maximum activation time difference between two adjacent electrodes was calculated to identify conduction delay (CD, ≥7 ms ) and CB (≥11 ms). Prevalence and amount of CD and CB were quantified per quadrant. PoAF was documented by ECG or continuous rhythm recording. Results: Recordings were derived from a total of 390,379 sites, resulting in 1,868 ± 285 electrodes per patient. Areas of CD/CB were present in all patients and at respectively 2,273 (34%) and 1,470 (22%) quadrants. Median prevalence of CD was 1.4 (0.2–3.7)%, intra-atrial variation was 8.3(1.2–33.4)%/cm2. Median prevalence of CB was 1.3(0.1–3.5)% and intra-atrial variation was 11.3(0.1–31.5)%/cm2. CD and CB mainly occurred at quadrants confined to the superior intercaval area of the RA. Sixty-three patients (30%) developed PoAF. There was no correlation between CD/CB and PoAF (P > 0.5). Conclusion: Quantification of the amount and spatial distribution of CD and CB per 1cm2 during SR demonstrated a wide intra- and inter-individual variety. The prevalences of CD/CB were very low, however a predilection site at the superior RA could be identified. CD/CB was not associated with development of PoAF. Our dataset generates a detailed reference dataset for future research on the arrhythmogenic substrate of AF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/18.suppl_1.i162c

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cocaine abuse prevalence among undergraduate students in Nigeria ranges from 0.6% to 10%.

    “0.6–10% among undergraduate students [26, 28, 33]”

    From The Burden of Drug Abuse in Nigeria: A Scoping Review of Epidemiological Studies and Drug Laws (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

    The cited study’s Methods and Results (page not provided) concern atrial conduction and post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients with coronary artery disease. Searches for cocaine abuse, Nigerian undergraduates, and the 0.6–10% range found no passage addressing the claimed prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lanters, E., Yaksh, A., Kik, C., Knops, P., Teuwen, C., Van Der Does, L., Bogers, A., Allessie, M., & De Groot, N.
Venue
EP Europace
Published
2016-06
Volume
18
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
i162-i162
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2600859219
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
EP Europace (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
conduction block, postoperative atrial fibrillation, sinus rhythm, epicardial mapping, conduction delay, atrial electrical remodeling, coronary artery disease, right atrium, Bachmann's bundle, pulmonary veins, left atrium, interatrial conduction, atrial activation time, atrial fibrillation risk factors, cardiac surgery, atrial fibrillation prevention, catheter ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review