Cited by 58Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Effect of ranolazine on atrial fibrillation in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: observations from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial

Open access
Scirica, B. M., Belardinelli, L., Chaitman, B. R., Waks, J. W., Volo, S., Karwatowska-Prokopczuk, E., Murphy, S. A., Cheng, M. L. +2 more·2015·Europace

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the effect of ranolazine, an anti-ischaemic agent with anti-arrhythmic properties, on the overall burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and determine whether ranolazine reduces the long-term incidence of clinical AF after ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: MERLIN-TIMI 36 randomized patients with non-ST elevation ACS to ranolazine or placebo. Atrial fibrillation episodes detected on continuous electrocardiogram (cECG) monitoring were reviewed in 6351 patients (97% of trial). Atrial fibrillation burden was categorized according to the time in AF: clinically insignificant AF (<0.01% of time), paroxysmal AF (>0.01-98%), or predominantly persistent AF (>98%). Clinical AF events were identified through adverse event reporting for a median 1-year follow-up. Overall, patients assigned to ranolazine had a trend towards fewer episodes of AF [75 (2.4%) vs. 55 (1.7%) patients, P = 0.08] detected on cECG during the first 7 days after randomization. The pattern of new-onset AF differed between ranolazine vs. placebo: clinically insignificant AF (five patients in ranolazine vs. seven in placebo), paroxysmal AF (18 vs. 48 patients), and predominantly chronic AF (28 vs. 20 patients, three-way P < 0.01). Among patients with a paroxysmal AF pattern, the overall burden was lower with ranolazine than with placebo (median 4.4 vs.16.1%, P = 0.015). Over the median 1-year follow-up, fewer patients treated with ranolazine experienced an AF event compared with placebo (2.9 vs. 4.1%, RR 0.71, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Ranolazine, an anti-anginal agent with electrophysiological effects, may reduce the frequency of paroxysmal AF in patients with non-ST elevation ACS with a pattern of lower overall AF burden in this group. Ranolazine reduced the overall 1-year incidence of clinical AF events. These atrial-specific anti-arrhythmic properties of ranolazine may be of clinical interest and warrant additional investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00099788.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euu217

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a post-hoc analysis of continuous ECG recordings during the first 7 days after randomization, patients assigned to ranolazine had a trend towards fewer episodes of atrial fibrillation than those on placebo (75 [2.4%] vs. 55 [1.7%] patients; P = 0.08).

    “In a post-hoc analysis of continuous ECG recordings obtained during the first 7 days after randomization, patients assigned to ranolazine had a trend towards fewer episodes of AF than those on placebo (75 [2.4%] vs. 55 [1.7%] patients; P = 0.08).679”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. The HARMONY Study. 2014. http://www.gilead.com/news/press-releases/2014/5/ gilead-announces-results-from-phase-2-study-showing-reduction-in-atrial-fibrillation- burden-with-the-investigational-combination-of-ranolazine-and-lowdose-droneda rone (19 June 2014, date last accessed).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scirica, B. M., Belardinelli, L., Chaitman, B. R., Waks, J. W., Volo, S., Karwatowska-Prokopczuk, E., Murphy, S. A., Cheng, M. L., Braunwald, E., & Morrow, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Gilead Sciences (United States) (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Scirica, B. M.
Venue
Europace
Published
2014-09-10
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
32-37
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2147216976
Cited by
58
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gilead Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
ranolazine, atrial fibrillation, non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, antiarrhythmic effect, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation burden, persistent atrial fibrillation, antianginal drugs
MeSH terms
Ranolazine, Acetanilides, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Massachusetts, Piperazines, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Placebo Effect, Prevalence, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Age Distribution, Sodium Channel Blockers, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review