Cited by 52Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

The first Latin American Catheter Ablation Registry

Open access
Keegan, Roberto, Aguinaga, Luis, Fenelon, Guilherme, Uribe, William, Rodriguez Diez, Gerardo, Scanavacca, Mauricio, Patete, Manuel, Carhuaz, Ricardo Zegarra +4 more·2015·EP Europace

Abstract

AIMS: To assess the results of transcatheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias in Latin America and establish the first Latin American transcatheter ablation registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: All ablation procedures performed between 1 January and 31 December 2012 were analysed retrospectively. Data were obtained on the characteristics and resources of participating centres (public or private institution, number of beds, cardiac surgery availability, type of room for the procedures, days per week assigned to electrophysiology procedures, type of fluoroscopy equipment, availability and type of electroanatomical mapping system, intracardiac echo, cryoablation, and number of electrophysiologists) and the results of 17 different ablation substrates: atrio-ventricular node reentrant tachycardia, typical atrial flutter, atypical atrial flutter, left free wall accessory pathway, right free wall accessory pathway, septal accessory pathway, right-sided focal atrial tachycardia, left-sided focal atrial tachycardia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, atrio-ventricular node, premature ventricular complex, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia, post-myocardial infarction ventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia in chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy, ventricular tachycardia in congenital heart disease, and ventricular tachycardias in other structural heart diseases. Data of 15 099 procedures were received from 120 centres in 13 participating countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Dominican Republic, Uruguay, and Venezuela). Accessory pathway was the group of arrhythmias most frequently ablated (31%), followed by atrio-ventricular node reentrant tachycardia (29%), typical atrial flutter (14%), and atrial fibrillation (11%). Overall success was 92% with the rate of global complications at 4% and mortality 0.05%. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation in Latin America can be considered effective and safe.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/europace/euu322

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fenelon G, Scanavacca M, Atie ´J, Zimerman L, Pereira de Magalha ˜es L, Lorga Filho A et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in Brazil: results of the Registry of the Brazilian Society of Cardiac Arrhythmias. Arq Bras Cardiol 2007;88:258-62.
  2. Keegan R, Aguinaga L, Pozzer D, Femenia F, Valentino M, Del Rio A et al. Registro Nacional de Ablacio ´n por Cate ´ter 2009. Primer reporte oficial de la Federacio ´n Argentina de Cardiologı ´a-2010. Rev Fed Arg Cardiol 2011;40:65 -71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keegan, R., Aguinaga, L., Fenelon, G., Uribe, W., Rodriguez Diez, G., Scanavacca, M., Patete, M., Carhuaz, R. Z., Labadet, C., De Zuloaga, C., Pozzer, D., & Scazzuso, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Paulista (BR)
  • Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno (AR)
  • Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires (AR)
Corresponding author
Keegan, Roberto
Venue
EP Europace
Published
2015-01-23
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
794-800
ISSN
  • 1099-5129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2092
OpenAlex
W2165462311
Cited by
52
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EP Europace (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Society of Cardiology
  • St. Jude Medical
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
catheter ablation, cardiac arrhythmias, Latin America, procedural success, procedural complications, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, accessory pathway, ventricular tachycardia, procedural safety
MeSH terms
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Latin America, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Risk Assessment, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review