The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Subjective health complaints in adolescence: a cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work was to study the prevalence and dimensionality of subjective health complaints in a cross-national population of adolescents. METHODS: The analyses were based on data from a WHO cross-national survey, Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC). The study included a representative sample of 11, 13 and 15-year-old adolescents from Finland, Norway, Poland and Scotland. Data were collected in 1993-1994 and the total sample included 20,324 adolescents. Subjective health complaints were measured by the HBSC Symptom Checklist (HBSC-SCL), including headaches, abdominal pain, backache, feeling low, irritability, nervousness, sleeping difficulties and dizziness. Descriptive analyses, MANOVA and structural equation modelling (EQS) were conducted. RESULTS: Patterns of reporting were consistent for all four countries. A large number of students reported a high level of symptoms. The reporting of most symptoms increased with age. Girls reported significantly more symptoms than boys and the gender differences also increased with age. Structural equation modelling suggests a model of two correlated factors, which can be labelled psychological and somatic. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that students report a high level of subjective health complaints already at the age of 11 years. The reporting of most symptoms increases with age and more so for girls than for boys. The finding of two dimensions that differ qualitatively, suggests that these dimensions may have different etiologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elgar, F. J., Pförtner, T.-K., Moor, I., De Clercq, B., Stevens, G. W. J. M., & Currie, C. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61460-4 · Cited by 521
Subjective health complaints in adolescence—Reliability and validity of survey methods
HAUGLAND, S., & WOLD, B. (2001) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1006/jado.2000.0393 · Cited by 465
Self-citationYeager, D. S., Johnson, R., Spitzer, B. J., Trzesniewski, K. H., Powers, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036335 · Cited by 389
Wiklund, M., Malmgren-Olsson, E.-B., Öhman, A., Bergström, E., & Fjellman-Wiklund, A. (2012) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-993 · Cited by 287
Otto, C., Reiss, F., Voss, C., Wüstner, A., Meyrose, A.-K., Hölling, H., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2021) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-020-01630-4 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Haugland, S.
- Venue
- The European Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-10
- ISSN
- 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-360X
- OpenAlex
- W1970414051
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subjective health complaints in adolescence: a cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurpub/11.1.4
- The paper
- Haugland, S. (2001). Subjective health complaints in adolescence: a cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality. The European Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/11.1.4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.