Cited by 32Injury Epidemiology and PreventionSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesTraffic and Road Safety

The impact of structural factors on the injury rate in different European countries

Open access
Melinder, K.·2001·The European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous study pointed to there being two kinds of injuries--those with a mainly social genesis and those with a mainly environmental genesis. The aim of this study was to analyse how socioeconomic factors--such as level of economic development, alcohol consumption and unemployment and more cultural factors--such as education and religion--relate to kinds of injury. METHODS: Motor vehicle traffic accidents were chosen to represent injuries with a predominantly environmental genesis and suicides those with a mainly social genesis. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) complemented by Pearson correlation was employed. The data come from 12 European countries. RESULTS: Four groups of countries emerged from the analysis. Group 1 was high on both kinds of injuries and was also high on all the independent variables considered. Group 2 was low on social injuries and high on environmental injuries; it had a low level of economic development, high alcohol consumption and a high proportion of Roman Catholics. Group 3 was high on social injuries and low on environmental injuries; it had a high level of economic development, low alcohol consumption and few Roman Catholics. Group 4 was low on both kinds of injuries; the independent variables formed a similar pattern to those of group 3. CONCLUSION: The pattern for traffic fatalities differs from that of suicides. There is also patterning with regard to structural factors; economic level, education and religion seem to be more important with regard to injury rate differentials than alcohol consumption or unemployment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/11.3.301

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Melinder KA, Andersson R. Stable and dynamic changes in injury mortality in the Nordic countries. What do they say about inherent national characteristics with regard to risk? Scand J Public Health 2000,28:16-22.
  2. Rossow I. Alcohol and suicide: beyond the link at the individual level. Addiction 1996;91:1413-6.
  3. Evans L The fraction of traffic fatalities attributable to alcohol. Accident Anal Prevent 1990;22:587-602.
  4. Neeleman J, Halpern D, Leon D, Lewis G. Tolerance of suicide, religion and suicide rates; an ecological and individual study in 19 Western countries. Psychol Med 1997,27:1165-71.
  5. Levin JS. Religion and health: is there an association, is it valid, and is it causal? Soc Sci Med 1994;38:1475-82.
  6. Jin RL, Chandrakant PS, Tomislav JS. The impact of unemployment on hearth: a review of the evidence. Can Med Assoc 1995;153:529-40.
  7. Norstr6m T. Alcohol and suicide: a comparative analysis of France and Sweden. Addiction 1995;90:1463-9.
  8. Murray A. The home and school independent of young drivers involved in traffic accidents. Accident Anal Prevent 1998,30:169-82.
  9. Ragin C The comparative method, moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.
  10. Coverdill J, Finlay W, Martin JM. Labor management in the southern textile industry: comparing qualitative, quantitative, and qualitative comparative analyses. Sociol Methods Res 1994;23(1):54-85.
  11. Hicks A. Qualitative comparative analysis and analytical induction: the case of the emergence of the social security state. Sociol Methods Res 1994;23(1):86-113.
  12. Amenta W, Poulsen JD. Where to begin: a survey of five approaches to selecting independent variables for qualitative comparative analysis. Sociol Methods Res 1994;23(1):22-53.
  13. Gerhards J. Religion and the spirit of capitalism, a comparison of attitudes towards work and the economic order in the USA and Spain. Berliner J Soziol 1996;4:541-9.

Authors
Melinder, K.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Melinder, K.
Venue
The European Journal of Public Health
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
301-308
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2028717055
Cited by
32
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
Keywords
injury rates, social harm, environmental injuries, motor vehicle traffic accidents, traffic fatalities, suicide, socioeconomic factors, economic development, alcohol consumption, unemployment, Catholics, structural factors, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Europe, Humans, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Suicide, Wounds and Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review