Cited by 2Public Health Policies and EducationHealth Services Management and PolicyHealth Policy Implementation Science

European-wide policymaking at the urban level: a qualitative study

Open access
Mueller, Julia, Patterson, Lesley, Jakab, Matyas, Higgerson, James, Steels, Stephanie, Verma, Arpana·2021·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background: Inter-urban area (UA) health inequalities can be as dramatic as those between high and low-income countries. Policies need to focus on the determinants of health specific to UAs to effect change. This study therefore aimed to determine the degree to which policymakers from different countries could make autonomous health and wellbeing policy decisions for their urban jurisdiction area. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, qualitative interview study with policymakers recruited from eight European countries (N = 37). Results: The reported autonomy among policymakers varied considerably between countries, from little or no autonomy and strict adherence to national directives (e.g. Slovak Republic) to a high degree of autonomy and ability to interpret national guidelines to local context (e.g. Norway). The main perceived barriers to implementation of local policies were political, and the importance of regular and effective communication with stakeholders, especially politicians, was emphasized. Having qualified health professionals in positions of influence within the UA was cited as a strong driver of the public health (PH) agenda at the UA level. Conclusion: Local-level policy development and implementation depends strongly on the degree of autonomy and independence of policymakers, which in turn depends on the organization, structure and financial budget allocation of PH services. While high levels of centralization in small, relatively homogenous countries may enhance efficient use of resources, larger, more diverse countries may benefit from devolution to smaller geographical regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckab016

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among people living with obesity, more than half (55%) reported that their mental health had worsened during the first COVID-19 lockdown in a recent UK-based survey.

    “Among people living with obesity, more than half (55%) reported that their mental health had worsened during the first COVID-19 lockdown in a recent UK-based survey [6].”

    From Supporting Weight Management during COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-Based, ACT-Based, Guided Self-Help Intervention (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results describe interviews with urban public-health policymakers, including 12 interviews in the UK, rather than a survey of people living with obesity. The Introduction’s 55% figure refers to the share of the world’s population living in cities. Searches for COVID-19 lockdown, worsening mental health, and a UK obesity survey found no passage supporting the claimed finding. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Food consumption and weight increased during the COVID-19 pandemic while physical activity decreased, particularly among those with higher BMI.

    “Evidence suggests that food consumption and weight increased during the pandemic while physical activity decreased, particularly among those with higher BMI [2, 3, 4, 5, 6].”

    From Supporting Weight Management during COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-Based, ACT-Based, Guided Self-Help Intervention (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction discusses urban health policy and mentions childhood obesity, but does not report changes in eating, weight, or physical activity during COVID-19. Searches for pandemic-related changes and higher BMI found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on wellbeing among people with obesity.

    “Emerging evidence indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on wellbeing among people with obesity [6].”

    From Supporting Weight Management during COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-Based, ACT-Based, Guided Self-Help Intervention (2022) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction mentions childhood obesity in the context of urban policy, while the Discussion addresses policymakers’ autonomy over health and wellbeing decisions; neither reports wellbeing outcomes among people with obesity. Searches for COVID-19, the pandemic, and obesity-related wellbeing found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mueller, J., Patterson, L., Jakab, M., Higgerson, J., Steels, S., & Verma, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
Mueller, Julia
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2021-03-16
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
931-936
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W3137363533
Cited by
2
References
42
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • EU Commission (FP7/2007-2013)
  • EUROURHIS 2 project (223711)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
local health policy, policy autonomy, decentralization, devolution, public health services, health determinants, stakeholder communication, European Union health policy
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Humans, Policy Making, Qualitative Research, Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review