Cited by 28COVID-19 and healthcare impactsGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer registration and cancer care: a European survey

Open access
Neamţiu, Luciana, Martos, Carmen, Giusti, Francesco, Negrão Carvalho, Raquel, Randi, Giorgia, Dimitrova, Nadya, Flego, Manuela, Dyba, Tadeusz +15 more·2022·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease COVID-19 pandemic posed a number of challenges to the oncology community, particularly the diagnosis and care of cancer patients while ensuring safety from the virus for both patients and professionals: minimization of visits to the hospital, cancellation of the screening programmes and the difficulties in the management and operation of cancer registries (CRs) while working remotely. This article describes the effects in the medium term of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer registration in Europe, focusing on changes in cancer detection and treatment, possible reduction of CR resources and difficulties in the access to data sources. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed in June 2020 to the directors of 108 CRs from 34 countries affiliated to the European Network of Cancer Registries, providing a 37% response rate. Results: The results of the survey showed that cancer-screening programmes were mostly stopped or slowed down in the majority of regions covered by the respondent CRs. Cancer diagnostics and treatments were severely disrupted. The cancer registration process was also disrupted, due to changes in the work modalities for the personnel, as well as to the difficulties in accessing sources and/or receiving the notifications. In some CRs, staff was allocated to different activities related to controlling the pandemic. Several CRs reported that they were investigating the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care via dedicated studies. Conclusions: A careful analysis will be necessary for proper interpretation of temporal and geographical variations of the 2020 cancer burden indicators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckab214

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many cancer registries worldwide reported disruptions to their operations during the first wave of the pandemic, and monthly cancer registrations were clearly reduced for common cancers as a result in many countries.

    “Many cancer registries worldwide reported disruptions to their operations during the first wave of the pandemic, 182,183 and monthly cancer registrations were clearly reduced for common cancers as a result in many countries.”

    From Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. (2024) · cites this paper as [183]

    The Results (Disruptions in cancer registration processes) report disruptions to notifications and data collection at some responding registries during the first wave. But the survey covered 40 registries in 22 European countries, not registries worldwide. The citation follows the first clause, so the later claim about monthly registrations is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neamţiu, L., Martos, C., Giusti, F., Negrão Carvalho, R., Randi, G., Dimitrova, N., Flego, M., Dyba, T., Bettio, M., Gavin, A., Visser, O., the ENCR Steering Committee, Gavin, A., Visser, O., Sánchez, M. J., Eden, M., Stracci, F., Šekerija, M., Trojanowski, M., Bray, F., van Eycken, E., Miranda, A., & Storm, H.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • European Commission, Joint Re search Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
  • Joint Research Centre (IT)
Corresponding author
Neamţiu, Luciana
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2021-12-22
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
311-315
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W4200283516
Cited by
28
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Joint Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, cancer registration, cancer registry, cancer diagnosis, cancer therapy, cancer care disruption, remote work
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review