The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variation in induction of labour rates across Irish hospitals; a cross-sectional study
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There was limited data for instrumental delivery96 and induction99 (online supplemental appendix S11, tables w-x) with some conflicting results depending on parity and previous mode of delivery.”
From Socioeconomic inequalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the UK and Republic of Ireland: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [99]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of cesarean delivery: a classification tree analysis
Stivanello, E., Rucci, P., Lenzi, J., & Fantini, M. P. (2014) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-215 · Cited by 32
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Hussain, 2011, Elective induction for pregnancies at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation and its impact on stillbirths: a systematic review with meta-analysis, BMC Public Health, 11, S5., 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S5 · DOI
- Gülmezoglu AM Crowther CA Middleton P Heatley E . Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Libr 2012; · DOI
- 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90631-R · DOI
- Koopmans CM Bijlenga D Groen H , . Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374:979–88. · DOI
- Boulvain, 2015, Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial, The Lancet, 385, 2600, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61904-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01086.x · DOI
- Brick, 2011, Exploring trends in the rate of caesarean section in Ireland 1999-2007, Econ Social Rev, 42, 383
- 10.1001/jama.1991.03460010059031 · DOI
- 10.1080/0144361021000020385 · DOI
- 10.1111/1471-0528.12177 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003865 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00241.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00291.x · DOI
- 10.1080/00016340701245427 · DOI
- 10.1067/mob.2002.127147 · DOI
- 10.1111/aogs.12329 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1002/sim.1970 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM200107053450101 · DOI
- 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182245b39 · DOI
- 10.3109/01443615.2013.772128 · DOI
- Bell, 2008, Trends in birthweight in the north of England, Hum Fertil, 11, 1, 10.1080/14647270701654369 · DOI
- 10.1093/pubmed/fdn112 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.289.22.2958 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01130.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.058 · DOI
- 10.1111/aogs.12263 · DOI
Cited by
Thomson, K., Moffat, M., Arisa, O., Jesurasa, A., Richmond, C., Odeniyi, A., Bambra, C., Rankin, J., Brown, H., Bishop, J., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042753 · Cited by 154
McMahon, L. E., O’Malley, E. G., Reynolds, C. M. E., & Turner, M. J. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05655-y · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinnott, S.-J., Layte, R., Brick, A., & Turner, M. J.
- Venue
- The European Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-06-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 753-760
- ISSN
- 1101-1262
- 1464-360X
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variation in induction of labour rates across Irish hospitals; a cross-sectional study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurpub/ckw060
- The paper
- Sinnott, S.-J., Layte, R., Brick, A., & Turner, M. J. (2016). Variation in induction of labour rates across Irish hospitals; a cross-sectional study. The European Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
