Cited by 30Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyPharmaceutical Economics and Policy

Extent of physician–pharmaceutical industry interactions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Open access
Fadlallah, Racha, Alkhaled, Lina, Brax, Hneine, Nasser, Mayse, Rajabbik, Mhd Hashem, Nass, Hala, Kahale, Lara A, Akl, Elie A·2018·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceutical companies spend large amounts of money promoting their products to physicians. There is evidence that physicians' interactions with pharmaceutical companies negatively affect their prescribing patterns. The objective of this study was to systematically review the extent of the relationship between physicians and pharmaceutical companies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: Studies assessing the extent of any type of interaction between practicing physicians and pharmaceutical companies were eligible. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases in July 2016. Reviewers worked in duplicate and independently to complete study selection, data abstraction and assessment of methodological features. We summarized the findings narratively. Results: We included 11 eligible studies (7 quantitative and 4 qualitative). Quantitative studies found that pharmaceutical company representatives visited at least 90% of physicians. Printed material, stationery items and drug samples were the most frequently received gifts. Two of the studies assessing direct payment found percentages of 16 and 5%, respectively. Findings of qualitative studies were consistent with those of quantitative studies. In addition, they revealed an increasing tendency for pharmaceutical companies to provide expensive personal gifts, sponsor social events and offer cash as inducements to physicians based on their demands. They also identified building personal relationships, creating a sense of indebtedness and emotional blackmailing as commonly used techniques to influence physicians. Conclusion: A relatively high percentage of physicians in LMICs interact with pharmaceutical companies. Findings have implications for policy and practice, given the current extent of interaction is likely affecting the prescribing habits and professional behaviour of physicians.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckx204

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dogramatzis D. Pharmaceutical marketing: a practical guide. Taylor & Francis US. 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fadlallah, R., Alkhaled, L., Brax, H., Nasser, M., Rajabbik, M. H., Nass, H., Kahale, L. A., & Akl, E. A.
Affiliations
  • American University of Beirut (LB)
  • Saint Joseph University (LB)
  • Beirut Arab University (LB)
  • Damascus University (SY)
Corresponding author
Akl, Elie A
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2017-11-20
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
224-230
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2770400875
Cited by
30
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Keywords
pharmaceutical industry, low- and middle-income countries, physician prescribing, conflicts of interest, pharmaceutical samples
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Developing Countries, Drug Industry, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Poverty, Conflict of Interest, Gift Giving, Marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review