Cited by 13Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMental Health Treatment and AccessMedia Influence and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of a national public awareness campaign on dementia knowledge and help-seeking in Ireland

Open access
Hickey, D, Glynn, R W, Shelley, E, Lawlor, B·2019·European Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Background: Dementia is a growing public health issue in Ireland primarily due to the ageing population. Increasing public knowledge of dementia has been identified as a key priority to reduce disease burden. This study evaluated the impact of a dementia communication campaign on dementia knowledge and help-seeking intention among the general public in Ireland. Methods: In 2016, a nationally-representative sample of over 1,200 adults in Ireland was surveyed to inform a nationwide dementia awareness campaign entitled Understand Together. Multiple factors were examined including sociodemographic characteristics, dementia advertising awareness, dementia knowledge and help-seeking intention. A similar survey (N = 1,003) was conducted in 2018 to evaluate public awareness of the campaign and its association with dementia knowledge and help-seeking intention. Data from the 2016 and 2018 surveys were analysed using univariable analysis and logistic regression, adjusted for sociodemographics. Results: Awareness of dementia advertising increased from 17% (2016) to 32% (2018) (p < 0.001). Women (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.14-2.00), rural residents (OR 1.48, 95%CI 1.10-2.00), respondents aged 40-59 years (OR 1.96, 95%CI 1.40-2.74) or 60+ years (OR 2.18, 95%CI 1.47-3.22), and those who knew someone with dementia (OR 2.06, 95%CI 1.55-2.75) were more likely to be aware of the campaign. Very good or good dementia knowledge and awareness that dementia risk is modifiable increased from 24% to 33% (p < 0.05) and 46% to 52% (p < 0.05), respectively. There was a linear association between campaign awareness and both help-seeking (OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.36-2.40) and holding a positive view of the potential benefits of early diagnosis (OR 1.97, 95%CI 1.35-2.88). Conclusions: The ongoing campaign, as well as future communication strategies, should continue to focus on increasing awareness of modifiable risk to support prevention. Campaign messaging/modalities should be targeted at harder to reach population groups. Key messages: Public communication on dementia can improve knowledge and help-seeking. Health communication campaign evaluation can identify, and inform the targeting of, hard to reach population groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.637

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another public awareness campaign on dementia in Ireland found a population-level increase in dementia risk reduction awareness after 2 years; it employed national mass media outlets and social media but also community activation.

    “Another public awareness campaign on dementia in Ireland, did find a population-level increase in DRR awareness after 2 years.Like our campaign, it employed national mass media outlets and social media but also community activation (Hickey et al., 2019).”

    From Increasing knowledge on dementia risk reduction in the general population: Results of a public awareness campaign. (2021) · cites this paper as Hickey et al., 2019

    The Methods and Results (page not supplied) describe nationally representative Irish surveys in 2016 and 2018 and report that awareness of modifiable dementia risk rose from 46% to 52%. The copy does not specify whether the campaign used national mass media, social media, or community activation, so those attributed details are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other studies evaluating awareness campaigns on dementia risk reduction are scarce.

    “Other studies evaluating awareness campaigns on DRR are scarce (Farrow, 2013;Hickey et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hickey, D., Glynn, R. W., Shelley, E., & Lawlor, B.
Affiliations
  • Health Service Executive (IE)
  • Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (IE)
  • St. James's Hospital (IE)
Corresponding author
Hickey, D
Venue
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2019-11-01
Volume
29
Issue
Supplement_4
ISSN
  • 1101-1262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-360X
OpenAlex
W2984873934
Cited by
13
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
European Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
dementia, public awareness campaigns, health communication, dementia knowledge, help-seeking intentions, campaign awareness, early diagnosis, dementia prevention, gender differences, rural residence, Ireland, population aging, advertising awareness, sociodemographic factors, help-seeking barriers, help-seeking facilitators, help-seeking motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review