Cited by 31COVID-19 epidemiological studiesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Endemic does not mean constant as SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve

Open access
Otto, Sarah P, MacPherson, Ailene, Colijn, Caroline·2024·Evolution

Abstract

COVID-19 has become endemic, with dynamics that reflect the waning of immunity and re-exposure, by contrast to the epidemic phase driven by exposure in immunologically naïve populations. Endemic does not, however, mean constant. Further evolution of SARS-CoV-2, as well as changes in behavior and public health policy, continue to play a major role in the endemic load of disease and mortality. In this article, we analyze evolutionary models to explore the impact that a newly arising variant can have on the short-term and longer-term endemic load, characterizing how these impacts depend on the transmission and immunological properties of the variants. We describe how evolutionary changes in the virus will increase the endemic load most for a persistently immune-escape variant, by an intermediate amount for a more transmissible variant, and least for a transiently immune-escape variant. Balancing the tendency for evolution to favor variants that increase the endemic load, we explore the impact of vaccination strategies and non-pharmaceutical interventions that can counter these increases in the impact of disease. We end with some open questions about the future of COVID-19 as an endemic disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/evolut/qpae041

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

24 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otto, S. P., MacPherson, A., & Colijn, C.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Otto, Sarah P
Venue
Evolution
Published
2024-03-09
Volume
78
Issue
6
Pages
1092-1108
ISSN
  • 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-5646
OpenAlex
W4392630588
Cited by
31
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5
FWCI
10.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2022-03726, RGPIN-2022-03113, RGPIN-2019-06624)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, endemicity, viral evolution, immune evasion, vaccination strategies, non-pharmaceutical interventions, transmission dynamics, waning immunity
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Evolution, Molecular, Endemic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review