The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening, Detection and Management of Depression in Elderly Primary Care Attenders. I: The Acceptability and Performance of the 15 Item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15) and the Development of Short Versions
Abstract
One-hundred and ninety-eight elderly subjects attending their general practitioners (GPs) were asked to complete the 15 item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15). Analysable results were obtained from 194 (98%). Of these, 67 (34%) scored above the GDS15 cut-off (4/5) for significant depressive symptomatology. 87.6% found the questionnaire to be acceptable and only 3.6% found it very difficult or very stressful. The GDS15 had a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.80). All the individual items of the GDS15 associated significantly (P < 0.01) with total score and 'caseness'. A single question "do you feel that your life is empty?" identified 84% of 'cases'. In an attempt to devise short scales to screen elderly primary care patients for depression, the data were subjected to logistic regression analysis. Ten (GDS10), four (GDS4) and on (GDS1) item versions were generated. Agreement between these short scales and the GDS15 in the original sample was 95, 91 and 79% respectively. Cronbach's alpha was 0.72 for the GDS10 and 0.55 for the GDS4. The short scales were then validated in an independent sample of 120 patients in whom both GDS data and the results of a detailed psychiatric interview (the Geriatric Mental Status Schedule, GMS) were available. The sensitivity and specificity of the GDS10 against GMS caseness were 87 and 77% (cut-off 3/4); those of the GDS4 were 89 and 65% (cut-off 0/1) and 61 and 81% (cut-off 1/2). Sensitivity and specificity for the GDS1 were 59 and 75%. It is concluded that these short scales may be useful in helping GPs and practice staff to identify elderly patients with significant depressive symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 · Cited by 15,025
Survival and Health Care Utilization in Elderly Medical Inpatients With Major Depression
Koenig, H. G., Shelp, F., Goli, V., Cohen, H. J., & Blazer, D. G. (1989) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb01249.x · Cited by 192
Cited by
Mancia, G., Kreutz, R., Brunström, M., Burnier, M., Grassi, G., Januszewicz, A., Muiesan, M. L., Tsioufis, K., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Algharably, E. A. E., et al. (2023) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000003480 · Cited by 3,473
Almeida, O. P., & Almeida, S. A. (1999) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199910)14:10<858::aid-gps35>3.0.co;2-8 · Cited by 1,299
Development and Testing of a Five‐Item Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale
Hoyl, M. T., Alessi, C. A., Harker, J. O., Josephson, K. R., Pietruszka, F. M., Koelfgen, M., Mervis, J. R., Fitten, L. J., & Rubenstein, L. Z. (1999) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03848.x · Cited by 832
Hawthorne, G. (2006) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-005-7746-y · Cited by 450
The criterion validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale: a systematic review
Wancata, J., Alexandrowicz, R., Marquart, B., Weiss, M., & Friedrich, F. (2006) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00888.x · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- D'ATH, P., KATONA, P., MULLAN, E., EVANS, S., & KATONA, C.
- Venue
- Family Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 260-266
- ISSN
- 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2229
- OpenAlex
- W2073073829
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening, Detection and Management of Depression in Elderly Primary Care Attenders. I: The Acceptability and Performance of the 15 Item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15) and the Development of Short Versions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/fampra/11.3.260
- The paper
- D'ATH, P., KATONA, P., MULLAN, E., EVANS, S., & KATONA, C. (1994). Screening, Detection and Management of Depression in Elderly Primary Care Attenders. I: The Acceptability and Performance of the 15 Item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15) and the Development of Short Versions. Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/11.3.260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.