Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A qualitative study of medication-taking behaviour in primary care

Dowell, J·1997·Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prescribed medication is a mainstay of primary care but it is clear that a large proportion of treatment is not taken correctly. Such 'non-compliance' is considered to be a major problem, but research to date has provided few solutions. There have been increasing calls for a change in approach in order to gain a deeper understanding of why the problem remains and new ways of addressing it. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how adult primary care patients perceived medication-taking using a Grounded Theory methodology. METHOD: Fifty general practice patients without major current mental health or recreational drug abuse problems were interviewed at home using a flexible interview schedule. Subjects' accounts of taking prescribed treatments were verified where possible by tablet counts or case-record review, six interviews being excluded as unreliable. Medication use was discussed for 159 prescribed treatments of which 34 were reportedly not taken as directed. RESULTS: The analysis is presented as a model of decision making which suggests that: (i) knowledge (about disease and treatment) combined with faith in the doctor produces the motivation to start using medicines; (ii) most patients test a medicine before accepting it fully; (iii) three types of medicine user exist: those who (a) passively accept treatment advice, i.e. try to take the medicine as they perceive the doctor wants them to, (b) actively use medicines, i.e. take it as they decide they want to, and (c) reject medication altogether; (iv) the process of accepting a treatment is closely linked to accepting the illness; and (v) practical problems are a late obstacle which only play a small part in the process. CONCLUSIONS: These concepts have been organized within a comprehensive model of the decision-making process, which is discussed with reference to other current theories of medication use. Researchers and clinicians must move beyond compliance when assessing or trying to improve medication use. Making the medication-testing process explicit is proposed as one way of assisting patients to use treatments better.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/14.5.369

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Dowell, J.
Venue
Family Practice
Published
1997-10-01
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
369-375
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2040557047
Cited by
167
References
0
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A qualitative study of medication-taking behaviour in primary care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/fampra/14.5.369
The paper
Dowell, J. (1997). A qualitative study of medication-taking behaviour in primary care. Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/14.5.369

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.