The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A qualitative study of medication-taking behaviour in primary care
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prescribed medication is a mainstay of primary care but it is clear that a large proportion of treatment is not taken correctly. Such 'non-compliance' is considered to be a major problem, but research to date has provided few solutions. There have been increasing calls for a change in approach in order to gain a deeper understanding of why the problem remains and new ways of addressing it. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how adult primary care patients perceived medication-taking using a Grounded Theory methodology. METHOD: Fifty general practice patients without major current mental health or recreational drug abuse problems were interviewed at home using a flexible interview schedule. Subjects' accounts of taking prescribed treatments were verified where possible by tablet counts or case-record review, six interviews being excluded as unreliable. Medication use was discussed for 159 prescribed treatments of which 34 were reportedly not taken as directed. RESULTS: The analysis is presented as a model of decision making which suggests that: (i) knowledge (about disease and treatment) combined with faith in the doctor produces the motivation to start using medicines; (ii) most patients test a medicine before accepting it fully; (iii) three types of medicine user exist: those who (a) passively accept treatment advice, i.e. try to take the medicine as they perceive the doctor wants them to, (b) actively use medicines, i.e. take it as they decide they want to, and (c) reject medication altogether; (iv) the process of accepting a treatment is closely linked to accepting the illness; and (v) practical problems are a late obstacle which only play a small part in the process. CONCLUSIONS: These concepts have been organized within a comprehensive model of the decision-making process, which is discussed with reference to other current theories of medication use. Researchers and clinicians must move beyond compliance when assessing or trying to improve medication use. Making the medication-testing process explicit is proposed as one way of assisting patients to use treatments better.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resisting medicines: a synthesis of qualitative studies of medicine taking
Pound, P., Britten, N., Morgan, M., Yardley, L., Pope, C., Daker-White, G., & Campbell, R. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.063 · Cited by 868
Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Morgan, M., Daker-White, G., Britten, N., Pill, R., Yardley, L., Pope, C., & Donovan, J. (2011) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta15430 · Cited by 619
Patients with psoriasis and their compliance with medication☆, ☆☆, ★, ★★
RICHARDS, H., FORTUNE, D., OSULLIVAN, T., MAIN, C., & GRIFFITHS, C. (1999) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70301-4 · Cited by 255
Medication Adherence in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Evidence-Based Review
Campbell, N. L., Boustani, M. A., Skopelja, E. N., Gao, S., Unverzagt, F. W., & Murray, M. D. (2012) · The American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.04.004 · Cited by 206
Peh, K. Q. E., Kwan, Y. H., Goh, H., Ramchandani, H., Phang, J. K., Lim, Z. Y., Loh, D. H. F., Østbye, T., Blalock, D. V., Yoon, S., et al. (2021) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06648-1 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowell, J.
- Venue
- Family Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 369-375
- ISSN
- 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2229
- OpenAlex
- W2040557047
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A qualitative study of medication-taking behaviour in primary care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/fampra/14.5.369
- The paper
- Dowell, J. (1997). A qualitative study of medication-taking behaviour in primary care. Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/14.5.369
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.