Cited by 86Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Qualitative methods: beyond the cookbook

Harding, G·1998·Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Qualitative methods appear increasingly in vogue in health services research (HSR). Such research, however, has utilized, often uncritically, a 'cookbook' of methods for data collection, and common-sense principles for data analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This paper argues that qualitative HSR benefits from recognizing and drawing upon theoretical principles underlying qualitative data collection and analysis. A distinction is drawn between problem-orientated and theory-orientated research, in order to illustrate how problem-orientated research would benefit from the introduction of theoretical perspectives in order to develop the knowledge base of health services research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/15.1.76

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harding, G.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Harding, G
Venue
Family Practice
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
76-79
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2123396212
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
21.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
qualitative research, health services research, qualitative data collection, qualitative data analysis, theoretical approaches, methodological quality
MeSH terms
Data Collection, United Kingdom, Health Services Research, Humans, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review