The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The good research guide for small-scale social research projects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Walk in Thirdspace: Place, Methods and Walking
Moles, K. (2008) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.1745 · Cited by 152
Cerratto Pargman, T., & McGrath, C. (2021) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2021.1 · Cited by 88
Ochieng, B. M. N. (2010) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732310381085 · Cited by 85
Factors influencing dairy farmers’ adoption of best management grazing practices
Hyland, J. J., Heanue, K., McKillop, J., & Micha, E. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.006 · Cited by 73
Food or medicine? The food–medicine interface in households in Sylhet
Jennings, H. M., Merrell, J., Thompson, J. L., & Heinrich, M. (2015) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2014.09.011 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Kane, M.
- Venue
- Family Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-207
- ISSN
- 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2229
- OpenAlex
- W2055439635
- Cited by
- 1,731
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/fampra/16.2.207-a
- The paper
- Kane, M. (1999). The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/16.2.207-a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
