Cited by 73Agricultural Innovations and PracticesAgricultural Development and ManagementAgriculture and Rural Development Research

Factors influencing dairy farmers’ adoption of best management grazing practices

Open access
Hyland, John J., Heanue, Kevin, McKillop, Jessica, Micha, Evgenia·2018·Land Use Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.006

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The general consensus in Irish studies is that adoption rates of practices in grassland management and reproductive performance are relatively low, notably due to information constraints.

    “To date, the general consensus in Irish studies is that adoption rates of practices in the areas of grassland management and reproductive performance are relatively low, notably due to information constraints (Hyland et al., 2018;Regan et al., 2021;Shalloo et al., 2021Shalloo et al., , 2018)).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood: Prentice Hall International (Vol. 5th Edn.). Prentice Hall International, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  2. O'Donovan, M., Geoghegan, A., Hennessy, D., O'Leary, M., 2015. Lessons from PastureBase Ireland -improving our focus on spring grass. Proceedings from the Irish Grassland Association.
  3. Pallant, J., 2010. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS. Environmental Quality and Issues of Adoption Research. Open University Press, London.
  4. Weber, E.U., 1997. Perception and expectation of climate change. Psychological Perspectives to Environmental and Ethical Issues in Management. pp. 314-341.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hyland, J. J., Heanue, K., McKillop, J., & Micha, E.
Affiliations
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
Corresponding author
Hyland, John J.
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
78
Pages
562-571
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884261880
Cited by
73
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
18.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Land Use Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • California Department of Food and Agriculture
  • Food Institutional Research Measure
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Keywords
dairy farmers, technology adoption, theory of planned behavior, farmer typology, resource constraints, grassland management, adoption intention, agricultural innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review