The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Routinely collected primary care data has underpinned research that has helped define primary care as a specialty. In the early years of the discipline, data were collected manually, but digital data collection now makes large volumes of data readily available. Primary care informatics is emerging as an academic discipline for the scientific study of how to harness these data. This paper reviews how data are stored in primary care computer systems; current use of large primary care research databases; and, the opportunities and challenges for using routinely collected primary care data in research. OPPORTUNITIES: (1) Growing volumes of routinely recorded data. (2) Improving data quality. (3) Technological progress enabling large datasets to be processed. (4) The potential to link clinical data in family practice with other data including genetic databases. (5) An established body of know-how within the international health informatics community. CHALLENGES: (1) Research methods for working with large primary care datasets are limited. (2) How to infer meaning from data. (3) Pace of change in medicine and technology. (4) Integrating systems where there is often no reliable unique identifier and between health (person-based records) and social care (care-based records-e.g. child protection). (5) Achieving appropriate levels of information security, confidentiality, and privacy. CONCLUSION: Routinely collected primary care computer data, aggregated into large databases, is used for audit, quality improvement, health service planning, epidemiological study and research. However, gaps exist in the literature about how to find relevant data, select appropriate research methods and ensure that the correct inferences are drawn.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carr-Hill, R. A., Rice, N., & Roland, M. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7037.1008 · Cited by 221
Problems with primary care data quality: osteoporosis as an exemplar
DeLusignan, S., Valentin, T., Chan, T., Hague, N., Wood, O., VanVlymen, J., & Dhoul, N. (2004) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v12i3.120 · Cited by 49
Cited by
Clegg, A., Bates, C., Young, J., Ryan, R., Nichols, L., Ann Teale, E., Mohammed, M. A., Parry, J., & Marshall, T. (2016) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afw039 · Cited by 1,303
Blak, B., Thompson, M., Dattani, H., & Bourke, A. (2011) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v19i4.820 · Cited by 630
Hersh, W. R., Weiner, M. G., Embi, P. J., Logan, J. R., Payne, P. R. O., Bernstam, E. V., Lehmann, H. P., Hripcsak, G., Hartzog, T. H., Cimino, J. J., et al. (2013) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1dbd · Cited by 567
Nicholls, S. G., Quach, P., von Elm, E., Guttmann, A., Moher, D., Petersen, I., Sørensen, H. T., Smeeth, L., Langan, S. M., & Benchimol, E. I. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125620 · Cited by 217
“Discussion The quality of reporting of research based on routinely collected health data has been suboptimal [14, 15], potentially resulting in misinterpretation or misapplication of research findings.”
BackgroundLiaw, S. T., Rahimi, A., Ray, P., Taggart, J., Dennis, S., de Lusignan, S., Jalaludin, B., Yeo, A. E. T., & Talaei-Khoei, A. (2013) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.001 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- de Lusignan, S., & van Weel, C.
- Venue
- Family Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-12-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 253-263
- ISSN
- 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2229
- OpenAlex
- W2132633479
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/fampra/cmi106
- The paper
- de Lusignan, S., & van Weel, C. (2006). The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmi106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.