Cited by 221Primary Care and Health OutcomesHealth disparities and outcomesHealth Services Management and Policy

Socioeconomic determinants of rates of consultation in general practice based on fourth national morbidity survey of general practices

Open access
Carr-Hill, Roy A, Rice, Nigel, Roland, Martin·1996·BMJ

Abstract

Objective : To identify the socioeconomic determinants of consultation rates in general practice. Design : Analysis of data from the fourth national morbidity survey of general practices (MSGP4) including sociodemographic details of individual patients and small area statistics from the 1991 census. Multilevel modelling techniques were used to take account of both individual patient data and small area statistics to relate socioeconomic and health status factors directly to a measure of general practitioner workload. Results : Higher rates of consultations were found in patients who were classified as permanently sick, unemployed (especially those who became unemployed during the study year), living in rented accommodation, from the Indian subcontinent, living with a spouse or partner (women only), children living with two parents (girls only), and living in urban areas, especially those living relatively near the practice. When characteristics of individual patients are known and controlled for the role of “indices of deprivation” is considerably reduced. The effect of individual sociodemographic characteristics were shown to vary between different areas. Conclusions : Demographic and socioeconomic factors can act as powerful predictors of consultation patterns. Though it will always be necessary to retain some local planning discretion, the sets of coefficients estimated for individual level factors, area level characteristics, and for practice groupings may be sufficient to provide an indicative level of demand for general medical services. Although the problems in using socioeconomic data from individual patients would be substantial, these results are relevant to the development of a resource allocation formula for general practice. Key messages: Characteristics of individual patients are much more powerful predictors of consulting patterns than the characteristics of the areas in which patients live The effects of individual socioeconomic factors themselves vary in different geographical areas Resource allocation methods based on area of residence (for example, Jarman score) will always be inferior to an approach that takes into account the characteristics of individual patients

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.312.7037.1008

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carr-Hill, R. A., Rice, N., & Roland, M.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1996-04-20
Volume
312
Issue
7037
Pages
1008-1012
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2064760556
Cited by
221
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
39.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
socioeconomic factors, consultation rates, general practice, primary care demand, general practitioner workload, unemployment, rental housing, ethnic minorities, urban-rural differences, family structure, small area variation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Data Collection, Demography, Employment, England, Family Practice, Female, United Kingdom, Health Services Research, Health Status, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Workload, Small-Area Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review