Seeing through the glass darkly? A qualitative exploration of GPs' drinking and their alcohol intervention practices
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Brief alcohol intervention is influenced by patients' personal characteristics as well as their clinical risk. Risk-drinkers from higher social-status groups are less likely to receive brief intervention from GPs than those from lower social-status groups. Thus GPs' perception of social similarity or distance may influence brief intervention. OBJECTIVE: To explore the role that GPs' drinking behaviour plays in their recognition of alcohol-related risk in patients. METHOD: A qualitative interview study with 29 GPs recruited according to maximum variation sampling. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was inductive with constant comparison within and between themes plus deviant case analysis. Analysis developed until category saturation was reached. RESULTS: GPs described a range of personal drinking practices that broadly mirrored population drinking patterns. Many saw themselves as part of mainstream society, sharing in culturally sanctioned behaviour. For some GPs, shared drinking practices could increase empathy for patients who drank, and facilitate discussion about alcohol. However, several GPs regarded themselves as distinct from 'others', separating their own drinking from that of patients. Several GPs described a form of bench-marking, wherein only patients who drank more, or differently, to themselves were felt to be 'at risk'. CONCLUSION: Alcohol is clearly a complex and emotive health and social issue and GPs are not immune to its effects. For some GPs' shared drinking behaviour can act as a window of opportunity enabling insight on alcohol issues and facilitating discussion. However, other GPs may see through the glass more darkly and selectively recognize risk only in those patients who are least like them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 10 qualitative studies, primary health care providers considered asking about alcohol a delicate task because alcohol is viewed as a sensitive issue, making them feel uncomfortable.
“In 10 qualitative studies, primary health care (PHC) providers considered asking about alcohol a delicate task because alcohol is viewed as a sensitive issue, making them feel uncomfortable [37, 41, 54, 77, 89, 91, 97, 99, 109, 115].”
Cites
Moyer, A., Finney, J. W., Swearingen, C. E., & Vergun, P. (2002) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00018.x · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works
Lock, C. A., Kaner, E., Lamont, S., & Bond, S. (2002) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02294.x · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationManaging alcohol problems in general practice.
Anderson, P. (1985) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.290.6485.1873 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Kaner, E., Lock, C., Heather, N., McNamee, P., & Bond, S. (2003) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00242-2 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Johnson, M., Jackson, R., Guillaume, L., Meier, P., & Goyder, E. (2011) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdq095 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Rosário, F., Santos, M. I., Angus, K., Pas, L., Ribeiro, C., & Fitzgerald, N. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-01073-0 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
General practitioners’ strategies to identify alcohol problems: A focus group study
Lid, T. G., & Malterud, K. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care · doi:10.3109/02813432.2012.679229 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Hanschmidt, F., Manthey, J., Kraus, L., Scafato, E., Gual, A., Grimm, C., & Rehm, J. (2017) · Alcohol and Alcoholism · doi:10.1093/alcalc/agx032 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Poplas Susič, T., Kersnik, J., & Kolšek, M. (2010) · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-010-1335-z · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaner, E.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kaner, E.
- ORCID
- Kaner, E.
- Venue
- Family Practice
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-23
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 481-487
- ISSN
- 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2229
- OpenAlex
- W2095939319
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Family Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-27-0084)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- brief alcohol intervention, social status, social similarity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Physician Impairment, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Risk-Taking, Risk Assessment, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review