Cited by 34Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Barriers to Alcohol Screening Among Hypertensive Patients and the Role of Stigma: Lessons for the Implementation of Screening and Brief Interventions in European Primary Care Settings

Hanschmidt, Franz, Manthey, Jakob, Kraus, Ludwig, Scafato, Emanuele, Gual, Antoni, Grimm, Carsten, Rehm, Jürgen·2017·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: 1. To quantify barriers to alcohol screening among hypertensive patients reported by primary healthcare professionals. 2. To examine whether education and screening frequency measures are associated with stigma-related barriers. METHODS: A web survey was conducted among 3081 primary healthcare professionals from France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. Participants were asked about perceived barriers to alcohol screening as free-text response. The replies were independently categorized by two raters. Stigma-related barriers were predicted by logistic regressions with education, knowledge on alcohol as risk factor and frequency of alcohol screening. RESULTS: In France and Italy, almost half of the reported barriers were stigma-related, whereas time constraints were cited most commonly in Spain and the UK. In Germany, nearly half of respondents rated the importance of alcohol screening for hypertension as low. Perception that regular screening is inappropriate or associated with too much effort, beliefs that screening is unnecessary, and insufficient knowledge of screening tools were cited as further barriers. Professional education on alcohol use was consistently rated to be poorer than the equivalent education on hypertension, and only a minority of respondents perceived alcohol as important risk factor for hypertension. Stigma-related barriers could not be significantly predicted by education, knowledge or screening frequency in most models. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, regular alcohol screening among hypertensive patients seems to be widely accepted, but further education (Germany) and structural support (Spain, UK) could contribute to increase screening rates. In France and Italy, screening uptake could be improved by addressing stigma. SHORT SUMMARY: Alcohol screening among hypertensive patients was largely accepted among general practitioners from five different European countries. Reported screening barriers varied between countries and included time constraints, stigma and underrated importance of alcohol. Results did not indicate a positive impact of education and screening frequency on perception of stigma as barrier to screening.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agx032

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Hanschmidt, F., Manthey, J., Kraus, L., Scafato, E., Gual, A., Grimm, C., & Rehm, J.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • Royal College of General Practitioners (GB)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Hanschmidt, Franz
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2017-06-13
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
572-579
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2619770773
Cited by
34
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol screening, hypertension, stigma, barriers to screening, screening and brief intervention, primary care, general practitioners, professional education, alcohol as risk factor, screening frequency, time constraints, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Attitude of Health Personnel, Europe, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Hypertension, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Primary Health Care, Substance Abuse Detection, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review