Cited by 35Health Policy Implementation ScienceCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementClinical practice guidelines implementation

Designing an integrated follow-up programme for people treated for cutaneous malignant melanoma: a practical application of the MRC framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health

Murchie, P., Hannaford, P. C, Wyke, S., Nicolson, M. C, Campbell, N. C·2007·Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complex health care interventions are difficult to design and evaluate, so the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) has developed a 'framework for the design and evaluation of complex health care intervention'. Researchers differ in applying the framework. OBJECTIVE: To describe and critically evaluate how the two initial phases of the MRC framework facilitate the design of an integrated follow-up programme for cutaneous melanoma to a standard suitable for testing in an exploratory randomized trial. Design of study. Literature review, expert groups, semi-structured interviews and pilot exercise to develop an intervention. SETTING: A department of academic primary care. Two general practices. METHODS: Four techniques were used-iterative literature review, a steering group, semi-structured telephone interviews and an operationalization exercise. These techniques were used simultaneously and iteratively to complete the theoretical preclinical and phase I modelling of the MRC framework when developing an integrated follow-up programme for cutaneous melanoma. RESULTS: Components of an integrated follow-up programme for cutaneous malignant melanoma were identified, developed and refined into a practical intervention comprising GP training; structured protocol-driven appointments; a centralized recall system; a rapid access pathway and a patient information booklet. Several barriers that could have derailed the successful implementation of the intervention, including the different perspectives of stakeholders and resource needs in general practice were identified. The value of the principles of the initial two phases of the MRC framework in guiding the development of complex health care interventions was supported. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that the first two phases of the MRC framework be used iteratively and simultaneously when developing complex health care interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmm006

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 4 WongICKonbehalf of the RESPECT Team. Randomised control trials (RCTs) to evaluate complex healthcare interventionsa case study. Pharm World Sci 2004; 26: 247-252.
  2. 14 Poo-Hwu WJ, Ariyan S, Lamb L et al . Follow-up recommendations for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stages I-III malignant melanoma. Cancer 1999; 86: 22522258.
  3. 25 Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation Team. Integrated care for diabetes: a clinical, social, and economic evaluation. Br Med J 1994; 308: 1208-1212.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murchie, P., Hannaford, P. C., Wyke, S., Nicolson, M. C., & Campbell, N. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (GB)
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2007-05-16
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
283-292
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2125826528
Cited by
35
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
cutaneous melanoma, follow-up care, MRC framework, intervention design, general practice, general practice training, recall system, patient education booklet, implementation barriers, stakeholder perspectives, primary care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Continuity of Patient Care, Family Practice, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Review Literature as Topic, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review