Cited by 47Chronic Disease Management StrategiesHealth disparities and outcomesThyroid Disorders and Treatments

Diagnostic labelling influences self-rated health. A prospective cohort study: the HUNT Study, Norway

Open access
Jørgensen, Pål, Langhammer, Arnulf, Krokstad, Steinar, Forsmo, Siri·2015·Family Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown an independent association between poor self-rated health (SRH) and increased mortality. Few studies, however, have investigated any possible impact on SRH of diagnostic labelling. OBJECTIVE: To test whether SRH differed in persons with known and unknown hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus (DM) or hypertension, opposed to persons without these conditions, after 11-year follow-up. METHODS: Prospective population-based cohort study in North-Trøndelag County, Norway, HUNT2 (1995-97) to HUNT3 (2006-08). All inhabitants aged 20 years and older were invited. The response rate was 69.5% in HUNT2 and 54.1% in HUNT3. In total, 34144 persons aged 20-70 years were included in the study population. The outcome was poor SRH. RESULTS: Persons with known disease had an increased odds ratio (OR) to report poor SRH at follow-up; figures ranging from 1.11 (0.68-1.79) to 2.52 (1.46-4.34) (men with hypothyroidism kept out owing to too few numbers). However, in persons not reporting, but having laboratory results indicating these diseases (unknown disease), no corresponding associations with SRH were found. Contrary, the OR for poor SRH in women with unknown hypothyroidism and unknown hypertension was 0.64 (0.38-1.06) and 0.89 (0.79-1.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness opposed to ignorance of hypothyroidism, DM and hypertension seemed to be associated with poor perceived health, suggesting that diagnostic labelling could have a negative effect on SRH. This relationship needs to be tested more thoroughly in future research but should be kept in mind regarding the benefits of early diagnosing of diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/fampra/cmv065

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Diagnostic labelling influences individual patient's self-reported health results as illustrated in a recent report derived from the HUNT study.

    “Diagnostic labelling influences individual patient's self-reported health results as illustrated in a recent report derived from the HUNT study”

    From Pharmacodynamic and Therapeutic Actions of Levothyroxine (2021) · cites this paper as [141]

  • Increasing age, lower education, smoking, low self-esteem, underweight, overweight, or obese and long-term illness/injury-but not thyroid function-predicted lower self-reported health.

    “Increasing age, lower education, smoking, low self-esteem, underweight, overweight, or obese and long-term illness/injury-but not thyroid function-predicted lower self-reported health”

    From Pharmacodynamic and Therapeutic Actions of Levothyroxine (2021) · cites this paper as [141]

  • Most (at least 75%) of the general population and subjects unaware of their thyroid dysfunction reported their health as good; however, only half of those aware of a diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction reported good health.

    “Most (at least 75%) of the general population and subjects unaware of their thyroid dysfunction reported their health as good; however, only half of those aware of a diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction reported good health”

    From Pharmacodynamic and Therapeutic Actions of Levothyroxine (2021) · cites this paper as [141]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jørgensen, P., Langhammer, A., Krokstad, S., & Forsmo, S.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Jørgensen, Pål
Venue
Family Practice
Published
2015-08-03
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
492-499
ISSN
  • 0263-2136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2229
OpenAlex
W2113852686
Cited by
47
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Family Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
self-rated health, diagnostic labeling, disease awareness, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, health perception, early diagnosis, HUNT study
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Hypertension, Hypothyroidism, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Prospective Studies, Young Adult, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review