Cited by 49Gut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyInfant Nutrition and Health

Structurally complex carbohydrates maintain diversity in gut-derived microbial consortia under high dilution pressure

Open access
Yao, Tianming, Chen, Ming-Hsu, Lindemann, Stephen R·2020·FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Abstract

Dietary fibers are major substrates for maintaining and shaping gut microbiota, but the structural specificity of these fibers for the diversity, structure and function of gut microbiota are poorly understood. Here, we employed an in vitro sequential batch fecal culture approach to address two ecological questions: (i) whether the chemical complexity of a carbohydrate influences its ability to maintain microbial diversity against high dilution pressure (ii) whether substrate structuring or obligate microbe-microbe metabolic interactions (e.g. exchange of amino acids or vitamins) exert more influence on maintained diversity. Sorghum arabinoxylan (SAX, a complex polysaccharide), inulin (a low-complexity oligosaccharide) and their corresponding monosaccharide controls were selected as model carbohydrates. Our results demonstrate that complex carbohydrates stably sustain diverse microbial consortia. Furthermore, other metabolic interactions were less influential in structuring microbial consortia consuming SAX than inulin. Finally, very similar final consortia were enriched on SAX from the same individual's fecal microbiota one month later, suggesting that polysaccharide structure is more influential than stochastic alterations in microbiome composition in governing the outcomes of sequential batch cultivation experiments. These data suggest that carbohydrate structural complexity affords independent niches that structure fermenting microbial consortia, whereas other metabolic interactions govern the composition of communities fermenting simpler carbohydrates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/femsec/fiaa158

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, T., Chen, M.-H., & Lindemann, S. R.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Lindemann, Stephen R
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Published
2020-08-20
Volume
96
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6941
OpenAlex
W3080489993
Cited by
49
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
dietary fiber, gut microbiota, microbial diversity, inulin, oligosaccharides, polysaccharides, microbial consortia, microbial metabolic interactions, amino acid substitutions, fecal microbiota, in vitro batch culture, community stability
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Dietary Fiber, Inulin, Microbial Consortia, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review