Cited by 115Gut microbiota and healthRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Shift of hindgut microbiota and microbial short chain fatty acids profiles in dairy calves from birth to pre-weaning

Song, Yang, Malmuthuge, Nilusha, Steele, Michael A, Guan, Le Luo·2017·FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize mucosa- and digesta-associated microbiota in the hindgut (cecum, colon and rectum) of newborn (NB, n = 6), day 7 (n = 6), day 21 (n = 6) and day 42 (n = 6) Holstein bull calves using amplicon sequencing. The hindgut microbiota was diverse at birth, and mucosa-attached microbial community had higher individual variation than that of digesta-associated community. In total, 16 phyla were identified with Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria being the dominant microbial taxa in the hindgut. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed a significant age effect on the proportion of mucosa-attached Escherichia coli, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium cluster XIVa and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Especially, high abundance of mucosa-associated Escherichia was detected during the first week of life, suggesting higher chance of the pathogenic infection during this stage. The relative abundances of predicted microbial genes involved in amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism and energy metabolism were enriched, indicating the importance of hindgut microbiota in fermentation during the pre-weaned period. Moreover, the significant correlation between short-chain fatty acid concentration and mucosa-attached carbohydrate utilizing (Coprococcus 1, Blautia, Lachnospiraceae NC2004 group, etc.) and health-related bacteria (Escherichia-Shigella and Salmonella) suggests the importance of hindgut microbiota in the fermentation and health of dairy calves during pre-weaned period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/femsec/fix179

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 115

Authors
Song, Y., Malmuthuge, N., Steele, M. A., & Guan, L. L.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Guan, Le Luo
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Published
2017-12-18
Volume
94
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0168-6496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6941
OpenAlex
W2780288442
Cited by
115
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
hindgut microbiota, dairy calves, pre-weaning period, short-chain fatty acids, mucosa-associated microbiota, Escherichia coli, Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Clostridium cluster XIVa, microbial fermentation, carbohydrate utilization, Holstein bull calves, age-related microbial changes
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Bacteria, Cattle, Cecum, Colon, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Feces, Female, Fermentation, Male, Weaning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review