The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Review of Damage by Mammals in North Temperate Forests: 3. Impact on Trees and Forests
Abstract
The impact of mammals on trees and forest crops is examined by reviewing the scientific literature. The degree of growth loss, stem deformation and the likelihood of death from browsing all increase with the severity of damage. The effect of the damage depends very much on the tree species, age and season. Many studies reveal that some compensatory growth occurs after browsing, but there is a serious lack of long-term data and more work that links the incidence of damage to ultimate yield loss is required. Browsing can also make trees more or less palatable and this could have a marked effect on the likelihood of recovery, but this subject requires further research for trees growing in British conditions. Bark stripping results in timber staining and decay but does not appear to cause serious growth loss. The amount of stem decay usually increases with wound size and tree vigour but a considerable amount of residual variation remains to be explained. The success of natural regeneration depends on both herbivore and seedling density. Changes in tree species composition reflect the palatability of seedlings as well as their ability to recover. Browsing by deer usually causes a decrease in shrub and herbaceous plant biomass in the ground vegetation and an increase in grasses, ferns and mosses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbance from herbivores and pathogens
Ayres, M. P., & Lombardero, M. J. (2000) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00528-3 · Cited by 788
Populus : A Model System for Plant Biology
Jansson, S., & Douglas, C. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103956 · Cited by 645
Ramirez, J. I., Jansen, P. A., den Ouden, J., Goudzwaard, L., & Poorter, L. (2019) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.049 · Cited by 100
Vole-driven succession in experimental wet-prairie restorations
Howe, H. F., & Lane, D. (2004) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/03-5182 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- GILL, R. M. A.
- Venue
- Forestry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 363-388
- ISSN
- 0015-752X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3626
- OpenAlex
- W2074821583
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Damage by Mammals in North Temperate Forests: 3. Impact on Trees and Forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/forestry/65.4.363-a
- The paper
- GILL, R. M. A. (1992). A Review of Damage by Mammals in North Temperate Forests: 3. Impact on Trees and Forests. Forestry. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/65.4.363-a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.