Populus : A Model System for Plant Biology
Abstract
With the completion of the Populus trichocarpa genome sequence and the development of various genetic, genomic, and biochemical tools, Populus now offers many possibilities to study questions that cannot be as easily addressed in Arabidopsis and rice, the two prime model systems of plant biology and genomics. Tree-specific traits such as wood formation, long-term perennial growth, and seasonality are obvious areas of research, but research in other areas such as control of flowering, biotic interactions, and evolution of adaptive traits is enriched by adding a tree to the suite of model systems. Furthermore, the reproductive biology of Populus (a dioeceous wind-pollinated long-lived tree) offers both new possibilities and challenges in the study and analysis of natural genetic and phenotypic variation. The relatively close phylogenetic relationship of Populus to Arabidopsis in the Eurosid clade of Eudicotyledonous plants aids in comparative functional studies and comparative genomics, and has the potential to greatly facilitate studies on genome and gene family evolution in eudicots.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Boujibar et al. observed the highest CO2 uptake capacity was about 5.65 mmol/g at 25°C and 1 bar.
“The highest CO 2 uptake capacity observed by Boujibar et al. was about 5.65 mmol.g -1 at 25 ᵒC and 1 bar [226].”
From Biomass/Biochar carbon materials for CO2 capture and sequestration by cyclic adsorption processes: A review and prospects for future directions (2022) · cites this paper as [226]
Cites
Schrader, J., Nilsson, J., Mellerowicz, E., Berglund, A., Nilsson, P., Hertzberg, M., & Sandberg, G. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.104.024190 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Karimi, M., Shirzad, M., Silva, J. A. C., & Rodrigues, A. E. (2022) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101890 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Brundu, G., & Richardson, D. M. (2016) · NeoBiota · doi:10.3897/neobiota.30.7015 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Modifying plants for biofuel and biomaterial production
Furtado, A., Lupoi, J. S., Hoang, N. V., Healey, A., Singh, S., Simmons, B. A., & Henry, R. J. (2014) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12300 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jansson, S., & Douglas, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Umeå Plant Science Centre (SE)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 435-458
- ISSN
- 1543-5008 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2123
- OpenAlex
- W2135372971
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Plant Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- Populus trichocarpa, poplar, model plant system, tree biology, wood formation, flowering regulation, species interactions, dioecy, wind pollination, reproductive biology, comparative genomics, comparative functional genomics, gene family evolution, eudicots, genome evolution
- MeSH terms
- Genetic Techniques, Models, Biological, Phylogeny, Seasons, Trees, Genetic Variation, Wood, Ecosystem, Genome, Plant, Populus, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review