Cited by 645Plant Molecular Biology ResearchChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Populus : A Model System for Plant Biology

Jansson, Stefan, Douglas, Carl J.·2007·Annual Review of Plant Biology

Abstract

With the completion of the Populus trichocarpa genome sequence and the development of various genetic, genomic, and biochemical tools, Populus now offers many possibilities to study questions that cannot be as easily addressed in Arabidopsis and rice, the two prime model systems of plant biology and genomics. Tree-specific traits such as wood formation, long-term perennial growth, and seasonality are obvious areas of research, but research in other areas such as control of flowering, biotic interactions, and evolution of adaptive traits is enriched by adding a tree to the suite of model systems. Furthermore, the reproductive biology of Populus (a dioeceous wind-pollinated long-lived tree) offers both new possibilities and challenges in the study and analysis of natural genetic and phenotypic variation. The relatively close phylogenetic relationship of Populus to Arabidopsis in the Eurosid clade of Eudicotyledonous plants aids in comparative functional studies and comparative genomics, and has the potential to greatly facilitate studies on genome and gene family evolution in eudicots.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103956

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jansson, S., & Douglas, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Umeå Plant Science Centre (SE)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Annual Review of Plant Biology
Published
2007-06-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
435-458
ISSN
  • 1543-5008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2123
OpenAlex
W2135372971
Cited by
645
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 37
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Plant Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
Populus trichocarpa, poplar, model plant system, tree biology, wood formation, flowering regulation, species interactions, dioecy, wind pollination, reproductive biology, comparative genomics, comparative functional genomics, gene family evolution, eudicots, genome evolution
MeSH terms
Genetic Techniques, Models, Biological, Phylogeny, Seasons, Trees, Genetic Variation, Wood, Ecosystem, Genome, Plant, Populus, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review