Stump Harvesting for Bioenergy - A Review of the Environmental Impacts
Abstract
Stump harvesting signifies an intensification of forest management compared with conventional stem-only or above-ground biomass-only harvesting. There are many practical and perceived benefits of stump harvesting. These include (1) the production of woodfuel; (2) fossil fuel substitution; (3) additional revenue for forest owners; (4) improved site preparation and (5) potential reduction of Heterobasidion . However, evidence suggests that, in the absence of appropriate precautionary measures, stump harvesting will lead to many undesirable environmental impacts. These include (1) removal of soil organic matter inputs; (2) adverse impacts on forest soil carbon stores and greenhouse gas emissions; (3) increased soil erosion; (4) increased soil compaction; (5) depletion of soil nutrient stocks and changes in nutrient cycling; (6) unknown impacts on future productivity; (7) loss of valuable habitat for fungi, mosses, bryophytes and insects and (8) increase in non-forest vegetation and additional herbicide requirements. To minimize environmental impacts, best practice guidelines should be developed and communicated. Research to date has focussed on the impact of stump removal on the incidence of root diseases and has limited applicability to healthy uninfected stands. Additional research is required to understand fully the environmental impacts, particularly how stump harvesting influences the forest soil carbon balance and forest nutrient stocks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical research on the magnitude of soil carbon emissions from forest soil disruption is few in number.
“Unfortunately, empirical research on the magnitude of these emissions is few in number (Jandl et al., 2007;Walmsley & Godbold, 2010).”
From The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy (2013) · cites this paper as Walmsley & Godbold, 2010
Cites
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919 · see citing works
Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution
Eriksson, E., Gillespie, A. R., Gustavsson, L., Langvall, O., Olsson, M., Sathre, R., & Stendahl, J. (2007) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x06-257 · Cited by 244 · cited 4× · see citing works
“That LCA model concluded that the greatest reduction in net carbon emissions corresponds with the stump harvesting treatment is perhaps surprising given the argument presented above – but refl ects a limitation of the method used by Eriksson et al. (2007) .”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mäkipää, R., Abramoff, R., Adamczyk, B., Baldy, V., Biryol, C., Bosela, M., Casals, P., Curiel Yuste, J., Dondini, M., Filipek, S., et al. (2023) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120637 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy
Guest, G., Cherubini, F., & Strømman, A. H. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12014 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Walmsley, J. D., & Godbold, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Bangor University (GB)
- ORCID
- Godbold, D. L.
- Venue
- Forestry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-12-03
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-38
- ISSN
- 0015-752X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3626
- OpenAlex
- W2098767243
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 35.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- stump harvesting, bioenergy, fuelwood, environmental impact, soil organic matter, soil carbon, greenhouse gas emissions, soil erosion, soil compaction, soil nutrient cycling, Heterobasidion, root diseases, soil preparation, forest management intensification, non-forest vegetation, herbicides, forest biodiversity, fossil fuel substitution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review